Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Man from Pickens

(1,713 posts)

1. It's just another blatant lie

Reply to Rilgin (Original post)

Wed Mar 11, 2015, 03:54 PM

Mar 2015

Sid Blumenthal's email was hacked a couple of years back and classified material was found that was sent to Hillary's private email address. So we already have hard proof of classified material in her email.

Not to mention that it would be completely impossible for her to do her job as SoS without handling classified material all the time.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Real questions difference between "classified" and "non-classified" emails [View all] Rilgin Mar 2015 OP

It's just another blatant lie Man from Pickens Mar 2015 #1

I can provide some answers Proud Public Servant Mar 2015 #2

It's a distinction without a difference for most people SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2015 #3

Not to lawyers though Proud Public Servant Mar 2015 #4

Both State and DoD use SIPRnet dumbcat Mar 2015 #5

Do we know her practice? Rilgin Mar 2015 #6

My guess would be Proud Public Servant Mar 2015 #7

I think there is a label called 'sensitive but unclassified' HereSince1628 Mar 2015 #8