Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(8,710 posts)

3. It's a distinction without a difference for most people

Wed Mar 11, 2015, 04:19 PM

Mar 2015

When people discuss "classified e-mail", nine times out of ten their referring to the actual message, not the system used for transmission.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Real questions difference between "classified" and "non-classified" emails [View all] Rilgin Mar 2015 OP

It's just another blatant lie Man from Pickens Mar 2015 #1

I can provide some answers Proud Public Servant Mar 2015 #2

It's a distinction without a difference for most people SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2015 #3

Not to lawyers though Proud Public Servant Mar 2015 #4

Both State and DoD use SIPRnet dumbcat Mar 2015 #5

Do we know her practice? Rilgin Mar 2015 #6

My guess would be Proud Public Servant Mar 2015 #7

I think there is a label called 'sensitive but unclassified' HereSince1628 Mar 2015 #8