Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(2,097 posts)

4. Not to lawyers though

Wed Mar 11, 2015, 04:32 PM

Mar 2015

So don't be surprised if the proud Clinton tradition of giving narrowly legalistic answers to common sense questions continues apace.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Real questions difference between "classified" and "non-classified" emails [View all] Rilgin Mar 2015 OP

It's just another blatant lie Man from Pickens Mar 2015 #1

I can provide some answers Proud Public Servant Mar 2015 #2

It's a distinction without a difference for most people SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2015 #3

Not to lawyers though Proud Public Servant Mar 2015 #4

Both State and DoD use SIPRnet dumbcat Mar 2015 #5

Do we know her practice? Rilgin Mar 2015 #6

My guess would be Proud Public Servant Mar 2015 #7

I think there is a label called 'sensitive but unclassified' HereSince1628 Mar 2015 #8