Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
22. first i want to make sure that that is indeed you argument. as for your pirate chart, it's
Wed Mar 11, 2015, 08:54 PM
Mar 2015

laughable.

there's no known mechanism that links pirates and temperature causally; unlike the proposed causal link between round-up and declining milkweed and other plant life affecting monarchs.


Tracking the Causes of Sharp
Decline of the Monarch Butterfly

A new census found this winter’s population of North American monarch butterflies in Mexico was at the lowest level ever measured. Insect ecologist Orley Taylor talks to Yale Environment 360 about how the planting of genetically modified crops and the resulting use of herbicides has contributed to the monarchs’ decline.

University of Kansas insect ecologist Orley R. “Chip” Taylor has been observing the fragile populations of monarch butterflies for decades, but he says he has never been more concerned about their future.

Monarchs are beloved for their spectacular migration across Canada and the United States to overwintering sites in central Mexico — and back again. But a new census taken at the monarchs’ wintering grounds found their population had declined 59 percent over the previous year and was at the lowest level ever measured.

In an interview with Yale Environment 360 contributor Richard Conniff, Taylor — founder and director of Monarch Watch, a conservation and outreach program — talked about the factors that have led to the sharp drop in the monarch population. Among them, Taylor said, is the increased planting of genetically modified corn in the U.S. Midwest, which has led to greater use of herbicides, which in turn kills the milkweed that is a prime food source for the butterflies.

“What we’re seeing here in the United States,” he said, “is a very precipitous decline of monarchs that’s coincident with the adoption of Roundup-ready corn and soybeans.”


http://e360.yale.edu/feature/tracking_the_causes_of_sharp__decline_of_the_monarch_butterfly/2634/


It's not flakes making such claims, BTW: and their research has nothing to do with correlations between pirates and global temperatures.

Yale Environment 360 is a publication of the Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies.

might just be ideology--he's also saying there's that "STEM shortage" MisterP Mar 2015 #1
really? i think he's gone over to the dark side. too bad. i used to like him on seattle tv. ND-Dem Mar 2015 #2
not quite "dark side," don't worry!--but he's a hydraulic engineer and impresario, MisterP Mar 2015 #4
Ah, I see. He's got a BA in mechanical engineering. The "science guy" is an engineer. And ND-Dem Mar 2015 #37
Easy there.... Adrahil Mar 2015 #122
And I have an MS in a science (more closely related to this topic than nye's) and ND-Dem Mar 2015 #123
I imagine a huge salad of 50's and 100's roguevalley Mar 2015 #79
"which have been linked pretty decisively to the decline of monarch butterflies" Major Nikon Mar 2015 #3
It's easier to rant and rave than realize that farmers are trying to grow as much food as possible. HuckleB Mar 2015 #5
Oh baloney. The US pays farmers *not* to grow food to keep prices up, and the only reason ND-Dem Mar 2015 #38
Keep ranting. HuckleB Mar 2015 #67
You don't want to discuss with me because you can't refute the truth. All you have are canned ND-Dem Mar 2015 #78
#Irony. HuckleB Mar 2015 #80
refute it then. without studies from people affiliated with monsanto. ND-Dem Mar 2015 #85
That's been done with you. HuckleB Mar 2015 #86
ditto, huckleberry. ND-Dem Mar 2015 #88
To get a sense why the monarch butterflies are in decline, I called Lincoln Brower, a professor of ND-Dem Mar 2015 #9
So what's the alternative? Major Nikon Mar 2015 #11
The alternative to what? The scientist says that Roundup is the primary cause of Monarch ND-Dem Mar 2015 #13
I'll make it simple for you Major Nikon Mar 2015 #15
Is that 'simple"? You seem to be saying that without GM & Roundup, something *worse* for ND-Dem Mar 2015 #17
It works both ways Major Nikon Mar 2015 #21
first i want to make sure that that is indeed you argument. as for your pirate chart, it's ND-Dem Mar 2015 #22
I've already read everything you're parroting Major Nikon Mar 2015 #29
so you're not even going to tell me if that is indeed what your claim is, that if there weren't ND-Dem Mar 2015 #31
You have it exactly backwards Major Nikon Mar 2015 #39
No more misleading than your claim that corn production has 'skyrocketed,' especially ND-Dem Mar 2015 #41
Series? Major Nikon Mar 2015 #44
"Increased" doesn't = "Skyrocketed". And if it increased because a big corporation lobbied ND-Dem Mar 2015 #46
That seems like it's more to do with monocultural swaths of land Marr Mar 2015 #18
"Genetically engineered crops have increased food output exponentially" ND-Dem Mar 2015 #33
Fine, let us just say "greatly increased food production" then. Marr Mar 2015 #34
Well, I'd say you'd get an argument if you claim GM crops have "greatly increased food production". ND-Dem Mar 2015 #36
I think I'd win the argument. Norman Borlaug's work alone increased the output of Marr Mar 2015 #43
The Green Revolution was 40s-60s, which is what you're referring to. Borlaug didnt do ND-Dem Mar 2015 #45
Here's one work on the subject from a person with credentials. ND-Dem Mar 2015 #56
Hmm-- some interesting information there. Marr Mar 2015 #57
"Particularly the part about genetically modified crops being unavailable... ND-Dem Mar 2015 #60
Huh-- now I can't find it. It must've been in one of the Marr Mar 2015 #66
thanks. ND-Dem Mar 2015 #77
Hardly "destroyed". It said the only variety of GM that would cause a problem is one being phased ND-Dem Mar 2015 #10
Ad hominem, seriously? Major Nikon Mar 2015 #19
I don't think you understand the meaning of ad hominem. And I only looked at the first two ND-Dem Mar 2015 #35
So why did you even bother to bring it up in the first place? Major Nikon Mar 2015 #40
Why did I bother to bring *what* up? Pointing out that some scientists have interests that ND-Dem Mar 2015 #42
Something really green I bet... ananda Mar 2015 #6
Haha.. well played Hutzpa Mar 2015 #7
Must have eaten some Monsanto corns Hutzpa Mar 2015 #8
Evidence FLPanhandle Mar 2015 #12
so what was the evidence? i believe that was the original question. ND-Dem Mar 2015 #14
+1,000,000 ... 000 HuckleB Mar 2015 #20
Here you go. DeSwiss Mar 2015 #52
One picture is not evidence. FLPanhandle Mar 2015 #58
Bill Nye and I share something... Archae Mar 2015 #16
Wow......... Logical Mar 2015 #23
"Nova" is one of the better TV shows, always has been. Archae Mar 2015 #24
I did an eight grade oral report on the Bermuda Triangle. zappaman Mar 2015 #27
So true! nt Logical Mar 2015 #30
Do you also share a BS in Mechanical Engineering? That's the sum total of his science experience. ND-Dem Mar 2015 #47
It's better than... Archae Mar 2015 #49
Certainly. But it's not a degree that gives Nye any relevant qualification to judge the ND-Dem Mar 2015 #50
Tenuous Position ND ProfessorGAC Mar 2015 #59
Certainly a BS in Engineering gives him the right to an opinion, and a general knowledge of ND-Dem Mar 2015 #61
Then We Still Disagree ProfessorGAC Mar 2015 #63
I also have a science degree: at a higher level, and more relevant than nye's. i've done ND-Dem Mar 2015 #64
You keep making this claim, but you keep showing that you don't understand the issue at all. HuckleB Mar 2015 #68
where do you find these people? wingnuts funded by the kochs and monsanto ND-Dem Mar 2015 #89
Oh, brother. HuckleB Mar 2015 #96
If you want to use Koch & Monsanto-linked sources, be prepared to be called on it. ND-Dem Mar 2015 #98
You can connect almost anything to anything. HuckleB Mar 2015 #101
no, you owe *me* an apology. ND-Dem Mar 2015 #103
The lack of shame is astounding. HuckleB Mar 2015 #104
can't stand the heat, eh? your koch references don't hold up to scrutiny eh ND-Dem Mar 2015 #124
And? ProfessorGAC Mar 2015 #69
someone can posit an opinion anytime they want. doesn't mean their opinion is ND-Dem Mar 2015 #90
"Do you also share a BS in Mechanical Engineering? That's the sum total of his science experience." NCTraveler Mar 2015 #106
No, it's the truth. A BS Eng. and some experience working at & consulting with ND-Dem Mar 2015 #112
Understood. NCTraveler Mar 2015 #121
They fed him Experiment #703? Rex Mar 2015 #25
Uh oh... GaltFreeDiet Mar 2015 #84
Movies are so cool. HuckleB Mar 2015 #87
Facts and evidence. Agnosticsherbet Mar 2015 #26
I'm guessing it was scientific evidence. bravenak Mar 2015 #28
I would love to hear the evidence that changed Nye's mind booley Mar 2015 #32
Nye has a BS in Mechanical Engineering. He worked at Boeing after he graduated, before ND-Dem Mar 2015 #48
NYE is a science advocate booley Mar 2015 #71
If you follow the evidence... HuckleB Mar 2015 #72
Uhh are you sure about that? booley Mar 2015 #74
It appears that you don't understand the topic very well at all. HuckleB Mar 2015 #82
right, no one understands the topic very well except the guy who keeps putting ND-Dem Mar 2015 #91
Lots of people understand the topic. HuckleB Mar 2015 #97
ooh, 'despicable' eh? ironic. ND-Dem Mar 2015 #100
No irony. Reality. HuckleB Mar 2015 #102
This thread isn't about Vandana shiva, and you're the only one who brought her into it. ND-Dem Mar 2015 #114
A fat check perhaps ? CentralMass Mar 2015 #51
It's either cash, power or sex. DeSwiss Mar 2015 #53
Or, you know, evidence. NuclearDem Mar 2015 #65
They've been trying to assimilate him to the borg for awhile. I guess they were ND-Dem Mar 2015 #93
Um, I'm vegan and both eat and have no issues with GMOs. NuclearDem Mar 2015 #94
and do you eat organic as well? ND-Dem Mar 2015 #95
Not generally, because the label "organic" doesn't equate to healthier foods. NuclearDem Mar 2015 #107
bill nye thinks it does. ND-Dem Mar 2015 #108
Good for him, but I'm my own man and can make my own decisions based on the evidence. NuclearDem Mar 2015 #109
and him eating organic when organic is 'meaningless' doesn't bring his reliability ND-Dem Mar 2015 #111
I don't know why he eats organic. And frankly, I don't care. NuclearDem Mar 2015 #113
nye the scientist loves organics (which many of our resident DU scientists think = ND-Dem Mar 2015 #115
Again, I don't know why he eats organic foods. NuclearDem Mar 2015 #116
it's only a fallacy if you claim his inconsistency proves his position must be wrong. which ND-Dem Mar 2015 #118
I'm done here. NuclearDem Mar 2015 #119
bye ND-Dem Mar 2015 #120
Youse can have the check or youse can leave. Now youse can't leave Monk06 Mar 2015 #54
Interestingly, my guess was that Nye was vegetarian or vegan, because he has 'the look'. ND-Dem Mar 2015 #55
Debate will continue until all results of putting these gene changes into the environment can be mmonk Mar 2015 #62
You have never advocated for "truth in labeling," just demonization via labeling. HuckleB Mar 2015 #70
How is it demonization? booley Mar 2015 #73
You don't? HuckleB Mar 2015 #81
easy... Monsatin converted him into a Genetically Modified Organism. Kip Humphrey Mar 2015 #75
What could account for such a change? That's some photo of employees with a faux Bill Bow Tie. appalachiablue Mar 2015 #76
So you think Bill is a big sucker! HuckleB Mar 2015 #83
Ha, ha. Not a big sucker, far from it. He seems like a person who knows just what he's doing. appalachiablue Mar 2015 #110
They've apparently been wooing him for some time. ND-Dem Mar 2015 #92
Proof he’s the Science Guy: Bill Nye is changing his mind about GMOs HuckleB Mar 2015 #99
The anti-GM lobby appears to be taking a page out of the Climategate playbook HuckleB Mar 2015 #105
... ND-Dem Mar 2015 #117
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»MoJo: What Did Monsanto S...»Reply #22