General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Vote for whomever you want [View all]BainsBane
(57,785 posts)You are continually making demanding I provide you this and that, while you refuse to provide evidence, let alone links, for your own arguments, like the "historical proof" you insisted existed that established that women made poor leaders.
You want to claim you oppose Clinton's "policies," when the policies she has are the same ones this president, the current SoS and the Democratic Party as a whole has. Incessant references to "corporatist" and "neocon" are not policies. They are empty slogans. No one who actually cares about policy confuses the two.
You insist on making yourself the subject in every response to me. I didn't mention you in this OP, or in the previous several posts where you came in and demanded I discuss you. I do not share your relentless focus on yourself and don't even give a thought to you or your arguments until you demand I do so. What you post or believe is your problem, and there is no justification for continuing to insist that you and your posting history should be the focus of my attentions and time.