Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Totally agree with Kristoff article today - " When Liberals Blew It "- [View all]cilla4progress
(26,525 posts)56. Out of wedlock birth and participatory parenting
aren't mutually exclusive.
Yes, BOTH parents are needed - extended family is also an important support system. But all marriages don't provide stability or involvement in parenting, and all out of wedlock children aren't born into homes where both parents don't participate.
I don't know what the overlap or statistics are, but it would be interesting to know!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
107 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Totally agree with Kristoff article today - " When Liberals Blew It "- [View all]
srican69
Mar 2015
OP
I am not so much against single parents as much as I am for delaying having kids
srican69
Mar 2015
#29
Moynihan was part of the advance guard of the neo-liberal/neo-conservative
Warren Stupidity
Mar 2015
#7
Perhaps the OP could have "discouraged" my ex-wife from having an affair, eventually creating...
villager
Mar 2015
#28
Seems Krugman has already debunked this. Kristof, as usual, is awful with the facts.
Chathamization
Mar 2015
#9
And that's it. BOOM goes the dynamite, and Kristoff's halfassed analysis. nt
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#15
That is absolute BS ..many people in Asia world are desparately poor/ unemployed and yet have
srican69
Mar 2015
#22
Then that also proves that marriage does nothing to relieve poverty or unemployment
betterdemsonly
Mar 2015
#66
This has been debunked so many ways and so many times. Blaming the victims of poverty never gets old
greatlaurel
Mar 2015
#13
but having a couple kids that they cannot supports feeds that same vicious cycle of poverty.
srican69
Mar 2015
#14
Maybe it is insulting and eugenic to ask poor people not to breed instead of raising their wages so
betterdemsonly
Mar 2015
#17
The prejudices of ethnic and class privilege are blinding you to how people become impoverished.
greatlaurel
Mar 2015
#37
Thanks to you & others for setting this RW spin straight, "unmarried women cause poverty" per
appalachiablue
Mar 2015
#92
What do you consider "not supporting" and what do you consider "best opportunities"?
uponit7771
Mar 2015
#46
Indeed. If marriage is the solution why are there so many impoverished children in Asia?
appalachiablue
Mar 2015
#94
So at the end of the day fuck facts and be racial hunh? Come on, progressives are better than this
uponit7771
Mar 2015
#16
I tend to agree with Mr. Wilson. Take away poverty and you are more apt to have stable
rhett o rick
Mar 2015
#87
Read Ta'Nehisi Coates' article in the Atlantic on reparations and educate yourself
brush
Mar 2015
#23
You realize that "policies that discourage single parenting among minorities" would just be
Marr
Mar 2015
#31
Why the fuck won't the GOP support a job bill? Why won't the GOP discourage racism instead of
valerief
Mar 2015
#53
What kind of policies do you have in mind and are you also sure you are not
TheKentuckian
Mar 2015
#72
(1) We need to have a justice system that doesn't lock up so many minority men.
Agnosticsherbet
Mar 2015
#86