Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Obama: No Permanent Bases In Afghanistan [View all]Daniel537
(1,560 posts)20. That's nice, but
the fact that there will be some troops there after 2014, supposedly for "counter-terror" ops means that a future President or congress could extend our presence there, or yes, make it permanent. Remember that the Iraq Status of Forces Agreement was going to be extended until the Iraqis backed off giving our troops immunity.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The number of our troops in harm’s way has been cut in half, and more will be coming home soon
pasto76
May 2012
#14
Wasn't the surge in troops that Obama approved intended for Froward Operating Bases?
bluestate10
May 2012
#40
How does "be fully responsible for the security of their country" transmute into...
PoliticAverse
May 2012
#41
That's right I didn't. I just clicked on the op's links which didn't include the quote
PoliticAverse
May 2012
#44