Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The most qualified human being to EVER run for President? No contest [View all]ileus
(15,396 posts)106. Beyond a shadow of a doubt...maybe the best human being ever.
not just seeking to be prez.
No one can realistically argue otherwise.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
224 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The most qualified human being to EVER run for President? No contest [View all]
NoJusticeNoPeace
Mar 2015
OP
She would have flown her B-17 stratofortress all over the old south bombing plantations and
Warren DeMontague
Mar 2015
#94
What Was Liz Warren's vote on that? Oh wait, she didnt vote nor do we have anything
NoJusticeNoPeace
Mar 2015
#120
She did vote on the ISIS Resolution, her vote was NO, this is of recent months
Thinkingabout
Mar 2015
#167
Can we find a candidate who neither owned slaves nor voted for the Iraq war?
Martin Eden
Mar 2015
#160
Perhaps you missed the meaning and context of "Can we find a candidate ..."
Martin Eden
Mar 2015
#200
Apparently we've entered the "just make up radom shit and say it authoritatively" portion of the
Warren DeMontague
Mar 2015
#91
She betrayed the Democratic Party and bowed down to Republicons. Is that your
rhett o rick
Mar 2015
#220
Excellent response. Ronald Reagan has caused more death and destruction than anyone
NoJusticeNoPeace
Mar 2015
#198
As much as I detested Reagan and Bush, I would still have to give the nod to Jefferson Davis. (eom)
StevieM
Mar 2015
#217
I am open to a resume you can provide from a former candidate that exceeds hers, so far
NoJusticeNoPeace
Mar 2015
#124
She was first lady of arkansas and US first lady. Then secretary of state. And before that,
ND-Dem
Mar 2015
#210
The ever popular 'Name Removed' also made multiple appearances. Too bad, Dittoheads! Good job, MIRT!
freshwest
Mar 2015
#153
Woodrow Wilson was hardly qualified. He was president of Princeton & than gov of NJ for two years.
Drunken Irishman
Mar 2015
#47
Ahh, of course not, since in this case that awesome resume belongs to the likely Democratic
NoJusticeNoPeace
Mar 2015
#127
Thomas Jefferson runs circles around Hillary in this and just about every dept.
dissentient
Mar 2015
#27
Someone made the argument that Nixon was the last liberal president. He certainly
ND-Dem
Mar 2015
#214
Wow! If that were so, who were the dumb asses that didn't support her the last time she ran? nt
kelly1mm
Mar 2015
#32
Running? Her resume does not rely on that she ran once before, at all...are you familiar with her?
NoJusticeNoPeace
Mar 2015
#129
You were alleging her qualifications were that she ran before, I thought. I am saying that
NoJusticeNoPeace
Mar 2015
#139
It is part of her experience, and while she was on Walmart board she pushed "Buy America" and pushed
Thinkingabout
Mar 2015
#44
And now, she has worked on and pushed the TPP - which is anti-"Buy America". Evolved?!
djean111
Mar 2015
#100
Since the TPP negotiations are in private we do not know if TPP is going to
Thinkingabout
Mar 2015
#136
I am not trying to convince you of anything. I am saying how I feel about the TPP.
djean111
Mar 2015
#158
I keep trying to establish that yes, it is my decision. So no need for you to repeat that! :-)
djean111
Mar 2015
#170
that ship sailed back when walmart was supporting the clintons in arkansas. cheap
ND-Dem
Mar 2015
#215
Rather have Scott Walker's business experience? You know, right to work and all?
NoJusticeNoPeace
Mar 2015
#130
My sincerity meter is faulty lately. This made me chuckle, and now I don't know
TwilightGardener
Mar 2015
#61
If your view of "most qualified" is to go by the CV, what about Daniel Webster?
Jim Lane
Mar 2015
#98
That has to be both the funniest and stupidest thing I've seen this morning.
hobbit709
Mar 2015
#102
She lost the nomination to a guy who had the toughest marketing hill to climb ever.
Marr
Mar 2015
#116
I know this is a serious discussion (maybe not?) but some comments like yours here
namastea42
Mar 2015
#168
This was alerted on I see... whoever did that sure is a rightwinger...
NoJusticeNoPeace
Mar 2015
#135
So you got nuttin, as usual. That resume of hers is awesome, I understand why you wont
NoJusticeNoPeace
Mar 2015
#132
So as usual you have zero to add to the conversation other than bashing Hillary and her
NoJusticeNoPeace
Mar 2015
#141
SO someone who supports the Dem Party and the likely candidate is the problem here
NoJusticeNoPeace
Mar 2015
#169
It's clearly flamebait, nothing else. But that's all the conservative Wing has. nm
rhett o rick
Mar 2015
#219
Hillary is very well qualified --so is Biden and others and hope to see a good Dem primary
riversedge
Mar 2015
#196
I think that Roosevelt after the depression was a lot better than Clinton would have been
LiberalArkie
Mar 2015
#204
She is the most qualified for those that supported George Bush's Iraq War.
rhett o rick
Mar 2015
#221