Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
23. So you advocate him running out the clock rather than
Fri Mar 13, 2015, 11:53 AM
Mar 2015

fac ing Justice?

Can he get a fair trial in Sweden? Why wouldn't he?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

But wait, anonymous internet experts have assured us the prosecutor can't do that!! riderinthestorm Mar 2015 #1
This is not good news for Assange hack89 Mar 2015 #2
That is all Assange has asked for! You're presuming his guilt riderinthestorm Mar 2015 #4
The prosecutor has said for years that the interview was the last step before arrest hack89 Mar 2015 #6
You are misunderstanding a basic legal fact of the case--this interview is the due process given in msanthrope Mar 2015 #7
No. I'm not. I know all of that perfectly well. Nt riderinthestorm Mar 2015 #22
It also puts Ecuador in an awkward position.. Although one wonders if Ecuador arranged this to msanthrope Mar 2015 #5
No--no one told you that. The prosecutor was under no obligation to do that. And the only msanthrope Mar 2015 #3
Oh FFS, plenty of DUers said she couldn't go. I'm not rehashing that old argument riderinthestorm Mar 2015 #21
So you advocate him running out the clock rather than msanthrope Mar 2015 #23
I'm not advocating anything. Simply pointing out the logical calculations riderinthestorm Mar 2015 #25
A person in Assange's situtation would get a fair trial. Unfortunately, he's also guilty as Hell... msanthrope Mar 2015 #28
It's already a fact that the prosecutor engaged in serious lies about his case riderinthestorm Mar 2015 #29
Care to cite that? Because the British courts heard Assange's msanthrope Mar 2015 #32
Yes, I seem to recall that line of reasoning. pa28 Mar 2015 #19
Interesting that he did not immediately accept the offer (nt) Nye Bevan Mar 2015 #8
Even more interesting they didn't make the offer 3 years ago. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2015 #9
Why would they? After he fled Sweden to avoid his scheduled interview, why would they msanthrope Mar 2015 #16
No. They are alleging it is because the statute of limitations is running out. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2015 #18
Did you even read your whole source?????? msanthrope Mar 2015 #20
Per the BBC, it appears he has accepted LittleBlue Mar 2015 #31
Cheerleading for rapists is sickening. Donald Ian Rankin Mar 2015 #10
Alleged. There's been no trial or even charges filed. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2015 #11
Well, no. That happens when a criminal goes on the run... Donald Ian Rankin Mar 2015 #12
He's not an alleged rapist, though....he's already testified that he did the acts listed on the EAW. msanthrope Mar 2015 #14
You be the judge LiberalLovinLug Mar 2015 #33
I think I'll take court evidence over some unverified leak. The EAW stands. nt msanthrope Mar 2015 #34
Criminal? Sweden is finally offering to meet with Assange after Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2015 #15
Bail-jumping makes you a criminal. You might dismiss the rape, but he is a bail-jumper. nt msanthrope Mar 2015 #17
There is no bail. He left (not fled) with Sweden's permission. Cayenne Mar 2015 #24
Um....you really want to claim there's no bail on Assange? nt msanthrope Mar 2015 #27
The 4 charges, as listed in the EAW, are filed after this interview, in keeping with Swedish law. msanthrope Mar 2015 #13
Well, that wasn't so hard now was it? pa28 Mar 2015 #26
But I was told this could never happen LittleBlue Mar 2015 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Swedes Offer to Question ...»Reply #23