Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

ProSense

(116,464 posts)

3. Given that

Reply to kentuck (Reply #2)

Wed May 2, 2012, 09:56 AM

May 2012

"Since we can now get more production from fewer workers...Should the rewards of more production go to the fewer workers or mostly to the top management? "

...this applies to the top as well, it's not an excuse for the disparity. I mean, there have been job descriptions made up to keep people at the top who don't do jack shit.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

EPI: The wedges between productivity and median compensation growth [View all] ProSense May 2012 OP

Kick! n/t ProSense May 2012 #1

Since we can now get more production from fewer workers... kentuck May 2012 #2

Given that ProSense May 2012 #3