Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: “Consumers Aren’t Spending Even In a Booming Job Market” [View all]DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)22. ''I’m thus mystified by the uniform tone of boosterism in the media...''
- I don't know why. All one must do is look at who owns the media and the reasons become self-evident.
K&R
[center]

[/center]
'Don't you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it. Every concept that can ever be needed, will be expressed by exactly one word, with its meaning rigidly defined and all its subsidiary meanings rubbed out and forgotten. Already, in the Eleventh Edition, we're not far from that point. But the process will still be continuing long after you and I are dead. Every year fewer and fewer words, and the range of consciousness always a little smaller. Even now, of course, there's no reason or excuse for committing thoughtcrime. It's merely a question of self-discipline, reality-control. But in the end there won't be any need even for that. The Revolution will be complete when the language is perfect. Newspeak is Ingsoc and Ingsoc is Newspeak,' he added with a sort of mystical satisfaction. 'Has it ever occurred to you, Winston, that by the year 2050, at the very latest, not a single human being will be alive who could understand such a conversation as we are having now?'
'Except-' began Winston doubtfully, and he stopped.
It had been on the tip of his tongue to say 'Except the proles,' but he checked himself, not feeling fully certain that this remark was not in some way unorthodox.
Syme, however, had divined what he was about to say. 'The proles are not human beings,' he said carelessly. 'By 2050 earlier, probably -- all real knowledge of Oldspeak will have disappeared. The whole literature of the past will have been destroyed. Chaucer, Shakespeare, Milton, Byron -- they'll exist only in Newspeak versions, not merely changed into something different, but actually changed into something contradictory of what they used to be. Even the literature of the Party will change. Even the slogans will change. How could you have a slogan like "freedom is slavery" when the concept of freedom has been abolished? The whole climate of thought will be different. In fact there will be no thought, as we understand it now. Orthodoxy means not thinking -- not needing to think. Orthodoxy is unconsciousness.'
~George Orwell, 1984
'Except-' began Winston doubtfully, and he stopped.
It had been on the tip of his tongue to say 'Except the proles,' but he checked himself, not feeling fully certain that this remark was not in some way unorthodox.
Syme, however, had divined what he was about to say. 'The proles are not human beings,' he said carelessly. 'By 2050 earlier, probably -- all real knowledge of Oldspeak will have disappeared. The whole literature of the past will have been destroyed. Chaucer, Shakespeare, Milton, Byron -- they'll exist only in Newspeak versions, not merely changed into something different, but actually changed into something contradictory of what they used to be. Even the literature of the Party will change. Even the slogans will change. How could you have a slogan like "freedom is slavery" when the concept of freedom has been abolished? The whole climate of thought will be different. In fact there will be no thought, as we understand it now. Orthodoxy means not thinking -- not needing to think. Orthodoxy is unconsciousness.'
~George Orwell, 1984
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
70 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I guarantee you that the ACA has negatively impacted my wife's income
taught_me_patience
Mar 2015
#55
One factor: the rising cost of healthcare is sucking every dime out of the economy
GreatGazoo
Mar 2015
#3
You're on Medicare and your union tells you what supplemental or Advantage plan you can have?
SheilaT
Mar 2015
#46
Then look into the Advantage and supplemental plans for your part of the world if you are over 65.
SheilaT
Mar 2015
#48
I believe it's because of the ACA, which requires various routine office visits be free.
SheilaT
Mar 2015
#64
Complaining about consumer spending...in a BOOMING job market? Thanks, Obama.
Fred Sanders
Mar 2015
#4
My own personal saga may help shed light on this paradox. After a prolonged bout
KingCharlemagne
Mar 2015
#5
I'm making ends meet with only one job (at the 30% pay cut), but only barely. If I want to have fun,
KingCharlemagne
Mar 2015
#20
I read somewhere quite awhile ago that 95% of the gains from this so-called
KingCharlemagne
Mar 2015
#18
The more often I live without tv, the more irritating it feels when I see one blaring away.
dixiegrrrrl
Mar 2015
#66