General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Swedish Prosecutor Lied As Charged. Admits No Legal Impediment to London Interview w/Assange. [View all]sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Five years later and still NO CHARGES FILED. Do you know why?
Well, for years we were told by the Swedish Prosecutor that 'we need to interview Assange as required by Swedish law, and there is a legal impediment to interviewing him in London'. Right? Remember that? Remember those of us who KNEW that was a lie saying so and being attacked for telling the truth?
There HAS been an investigation, EVIDENCE has been produced. And THAT is why no charges have ever been, nor ever will be, filed.
Because the evidence shows that the allegations were false.
So, what to do once that was established? Make a false claim to drag it out, that Sweden's Law forbade interviewing Assange in London! LOL! What a crock that was considering how often this had been done in the past.
And now, the Prosecutor has been exposed as the liar she is.
As members of the Swedish Parliament said recently, either FILE YOUR CHARGES or END THIS CHARADE.
He had to be silenced once he revealed that Wikileaks was about to exposse massive corruption wrt to a 'major bank', which it is now established was BOA.
Coincidentally, BOA was taking bids on contracts to SMEAR those who were pursuing this story, including then blogger, Glenn Greenwald.
This was a scam from day one. The first prosecutor got it right.
The presence of Karl Rove in all this should have been enough for Democrats at least, but strange things have been happening regarding these issues since Bush left office.