General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Swedish Prosecutor Lied As Charged. Admits No Legal Impediment to London Interview w/Assange. [View all]sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)that is all. They were drawn up to get an Interpol Warrant, WITH NO EVIDENCE PRESENTED, no notification to the Defense. But after finally gaining access to them, ALL have been CHALLENGED, but NOT IN THE COURT WHERE THEY NEED to be challenged, in SWEDEN.
BECAUSE NO CHARGES HAVE BEEN FILED. Allegations are NOT CHARGES.
Do NOT call me a liar. Show me the charges filed by the Swedish Prosecutor IN SWEDEN.
The made up nonsense presented to the same British Court which allowed Pinochet to go free, the BIASED court that requires no PROOF of allegations, is IRRELEVANT to this case.
The Prosecutor LIED for several years claiming she COULD NOT INTERVIEW ASSANGE IN LONDON. THAT was a LIE.
Of couse the Statute is running out because SHE FAILED TO FILE CHARGES.
You are either completely unaware of the facts of this case or deliberately trying to continue the years long charade that NO ONE believes any longer.
Your personal attacks, and attempts to use the same old 'you love Assange' to substitute for FACTS, are wasted on me.
I love THE TRUTH. Period. I don't deal in personalities. So stop lying about me, I will not hesitate to correct any and all lies told about me.
And btw, the fact that you WOULD try to smear someone who is just an ordinary person with no power to change anything, by claiming I care PERSONALLY about Assange, who I do not know, is indicative to ME of how far they will go when someone actually DOES have the power to expose the corrupt Banks and Governments.
So thanks for the demonstration of what all this is REALLY about.