The Swedish Prosecutor Lied As Charged. Admits No Legal Impediment to London Interview w/Assange.

[sabrina 1]

234. Your lack of understanding of this case is astounding. So once again, WHERE ARE THE CHARGES

(you can post that garbage drawn up with ZERO evidence, debunked long ago, as often as you wish in order to avoid answering the question, why would a prosecutor REFUSE to file charges for nearly FIVE years, and LIE about her reasons for that refusal.

You appear to know NOTHING about WHY she could not file those charges.

Here's a hint ... both women have DENIED being raped, and that was NEVER the accusation to begin with.

Your attempt to alter the meaning of the allegations is despicable. Women are HARMED by these kinds of false claims, especially when the WORLD has the information apparently you prefer to ignore, though the women themselves have not.

So again, I am interested in only one thing, WHY HAS THE SWEDISH PROSECUTOR REFUSED TO FILE CHARGES for nearaly FIVE YEARS, and why did she LIE about her reasons for refusing to do so?

I can see you are struggling very hard not to answer that question.

What you posted has zero to do with the case because so far, THERE HAS BEEN NO CASE.

It's a simple question, WHERE ARE THE CHARGES FILED IN SWEDEN?