The Swedish Prosecutor Lied As Charged. Admits No Legal Impediment to London Interview w/Assange.

[sabrina 1]

286. Actually it was Bank of America who most likely set him up. The set up began a couple of weeks

after an interview he gave in which he stated that Wikileaks had received documents they would be releasing that 'could bring down a major Bank'. That bank was presumed to be BOA.

This was at a time when they were working hard to hide the corruption that had brought down the World Economy, desperately trying to avoid prosecutions, as happened in Iceland.

Not to mention it was Wikileaks who exposed the Corrupt Bankers and Politicians in Iceland, causing them to be arrested and charged.

When that happened, the rest of the Banks and Politicians who aided and abetted them jumped into action to ensure there would be no more Icelands.

As far as the CIA, Wikileaks posted a leaked document from the CIA years ago in which they discussed 'how to bring down Wikileaks'. They discarded the notion of physical harm and settled on 'a sexual smear campaign'.

Whether they were involved in this or not, doesn't really matter. We KNOW from Anonymous leaks, that BOA had contract bids out on Left bloggers, whistle blowers and journalists, who were digging into the corruption, and that 'security contractors' were bidding on those contracts. There is simply no doubt about that.