Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

blm

(114,653 posts)
1. I'm as tough as anyone on this media, but, I do kinda understand why DHS
Sat Mar 14, 2015, 01:40 PM
Mar 2015

and LEO's don't want widespread coverage - these crazy RW extremists view this as 'revolution has begun' and widespread coverage could feed into their warped views and unleash more of them with their 'Second Amendment Remedy' delusions.

Personally, I think it should be given widespread coverage so these groups and individuals could be drawn out of their depths and their rhetoric compared to GOP candidates and lawmakers so their bullshit theories can be shot down. But, I do understand from a public safety point of view why officials would not want it more visible. Don't agree with it, but, do understand the POV.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hey MSM where’s all the F...»Reply #1