Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: A Guide to Centrism [View all]

delrem

(9,688 posts)
24. First they buy the name, then say you must vote for them because of the name.
Sun Mar 15, 2015, 03:00 AM
Mar 2015

Here in BC, Canada, the old right-wing Social Credit so disgraced itself that it was wiped out (provincial politics). So a bunch of Howe St (BC's smaller version of Wall St) corporate back room dealers pumped money and resources (they had all the money and connections and they could buy good employees) into buying out the rump Liberal party, and so voila, the identical Social Credit wheeler dealers now had a new party, instantly. In a matter of a few months they had a new name complete with a brand spanking new leader, and by pumping mega money into the next election what do you know, they won. Not surprising - their controllers owned all the media, the radio, the TV, the newspapers. They call themselves "Liberals" but they're corporatists. It's pitiful but that's all they are, there's nothing more to them. Identical in tone to the Third Way, they include just enough "social content" in their platform as needed to keep the population placid - and not a drop more.

If you want to be a loser then yes, turn your mind off and vote for a name because you think it's a nice feel good name -- and don't look any deeper. For the love of all that's holy, don't think! Oppose all politics that doesn't promote the politicians sporting that feel good name. Marginalize them. Explain about how they aren't "realistic", how they don't know how to tie their own shoes.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

A Guide to Centrism [View all] madfloridian Mar 2015 OP
I do not view the world through rose colored glasses. Why is it necessary to chastise Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #1
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world ... Fumesucker Mar 2015 #3
Oh, come on now. You call that chastising? There are many kinds of Democrats. madfloridian Mar 2015 #4
The majority of these replies is more evidence of my point. This is what Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #28
I am not dividing the party. This was planned and plotted in the 80s. By their own words... madfloridian Mar 2015 #31
Why keep iy going, how has this been working in getting Democrats elected. Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #32
The GOP policies were all too often enabled... madfloridian Mar 2015 #35
I know there are some issues which are important to both parties so they Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #36
Last I read they were trying to put Soc. Sec. cuts back on the table... madfloridian Mar 2015 #38
This is what we have to fight against, and it is going to take a few election cycles Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #39
why elect democrats if they're republicans? is 'democrat' just a name, or does it ND-Dem Mar 2015 #12
Why does the Dem Leadership 'chastise' to use your word, the Left, but rarely criticize the Right? sabrina 1 Mar 2015 #13
Good question. madfloridian Mar 2015 #14
You are so right, Sabrina 1. JDPriestly Mar 2015 #22
Go have a look at Dov Hikind, and then come back and tell me every Democrat is worth electing Scootaloo Mar 2015 #19
First they buy the name, then say you must vote for them because of the name. delrem Mar 2015 #24
It IS necessary to elect Democrats. JDPriestly Mar 2015 #21
Chastise? This is a description of what's happened to the political spectrum. cui bono Mar 2015 #23
+ a ton LondonReign2 Mar 2015 #29
It is ridiculous how often "far leftists" are chastised around here, and you stillwaiting Mar 2015 #26
Thank you! CANDO Mar 2015 #30
I agree. madfloridian Mar 2015 #37
Centrists, both parties, are corporatist cynics. Both progressives & conservatives have principles. w4rma Mar 2015 #2
I agree....it's not a simple line. Complicated. madfloridian Mar 2015 #5
The progressive ideology is what most Americans support, if you don't label it. w4rma Mar 2015 #6
IF we don't label it, actually say the word. madfloridian Mar 2015 #7
I don't need the label. I only want the policies. (nt) w4rma Mar 2015 #8
I don't want to feel shunned by my own party. madfloridian Mar 2015 #11
Oh, people like Rahm Emmanuel (and his enablers) don't support progressive policies. w4rma Mar 2015 #44
True, and that was proven in the last two midterms, where Progressive Issues appeared sabrina 1 Mar 2015 #16
Exactly. And don't forget that the "centrists" who ran on neoliberal platforms lost. (nt) w4rma Mar 2015 #45
Yes, they did and they are going to keep losing which doesn't seem to bother sabrina 1 Mar 2015 #46
Yes both parties took a huge lurch to the right. Rex Mar 2015 #9
Would not be so upset except it was planned that way. madfloridian Mar 2015 #10
k&r Dragonfli Mar 2015 #15
Keep going to the right ---> blkmusclmachine Mar 2015 #17
Only one problem, there is no more room to go right. Rex Mar 2015 #20
You are right. madfloridian Mar 2015 #40
I know I will get yelled at for having an opinion, but here goes anyway. Rex Mar 2015 #43
Centrists - killing Democratic elections by creating one disenfranchised voter at a time. whereisjustice Mar 2015 #18
Centrist Democrats = Republicans embarrassed by their racist Republican brethren anotojefiremnesuka Mar 2015 #25
their stance is explicitly "most everything Bush pushed, BUT we don't think gays cause hurricanes" MisterP Mar 2015 #34
Not a Centrist jopacaco Mar 2015 #27
Centrists = Republican Lite nt Matrosov Mar 2015 #33
Conversation with Ben Carson supporter blew my mind... madfloridian Mar 2015 #41
Huge K & R !!! - Thank You !!! WillyT Mar 2015 #42
Welcome Willy T madfloridian Mar 2015 #47
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A Guide to Centrism»Reply #24