The Swedish Prosecutor Lied As Charged. Admits No Legal Impediment to London Interview w/Assange.

[sabrina 1]

405. I stated facts, if you don't like the facts, I can't help you.

You're having a hard time accepting some simple, indisputable facts, I have no idea why, it's not my concern.

You're spending a lot of time on attempting to divert attention AWAY from the facts with all kinds of 'suppositions', which is a useless exercise in the face of the facts.

I know nothing beyond the facts that are known and will continue to present them. YOU can continue to ignore them, that is your choice, but it won't change them.

This OP is about the lies told by the Swedish Prosecutor for more than four years.

It is about her having to be ORDERED to do what she could have done years ago, while she denied she could do it.

That is all this is about. Dispute that if you can. You can't so now you're all over the place trying to distract from the facts.

It's not working, the Prosecutor Lied, nothing that woman says from now on can be trusted.

She should be removed from this case for prosecutorial misconduct.

You want to go wandering off into far left field, by my guest.

I am focused on the facts we know, not speculation.