Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 20 year old man charged with shooting officers in Ferguson [View all]blm
(113,052 posts)93. Meaning as good as any other considering the fact that there have been more
law enforcement ambushed and shot by RW extremists in recent years than there have been shot at around or near protests.
That seems to be a factor no one wants to address in their haste to condemn what was clearly written as possibility based on the recent spate of cop shootings, especially over the past year.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
119 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The original reporsts said a handgun. There were a lot of theads here at DU
Agnosticsherbet
Mar 2015
#1
I thought it would be of interest here, which was why I mentioned I wasn't sure.
herding cats
Mar 2015
#3
"Shooting at someone else and hitting the police" is as far from bad luck as you can get.
cherokeeprogressive
Mar 2015
#38
I saw the video of the actual shooting and saw no car in the frame. Also heard the eye witnesses
sabrina 1
Mar 2015
#4
Apparently speculation of the "could have been" variety now qualifies as a good guess. n/t
cherokeeprogressive
Mar 2015
#40
So immediately flapping your arms and announcing who you want the perps to be is a better way to go?
Throd
Mar 2015
#32
Yes, I was defending the Klan. It's hard to type wearing my pointy hood with the little eye holes.
Throd
Mar 2015
#92
It wasn't stated, it was clearly preceded by the words, 'I think' and 'could have been'
blm
Mar 2015
#94
Thanks for saying it, I am getting tired of the fake outrage or whatever the crap is
Rex
Mar 2015
#83
Not 'highly unlikely' to anyone following the reports and articles on the subject.
blm
Mar 2015
#103
If according to him, he was not shooting at the cops, then what was he "protesting"?
GoneFishin
Mar 2015
#7
Gee, what a surprise. They catch a guy that fits their profile and call him a protester right off
NoJusticeNoPeace
Mar 2015
#9
And so far, no audio has been released, even though that Christmas claimed that there was audio.
GGJohn
Mar 2015
#65
I said I knew absolutely he was innocent of anything? When did I do that?
NoJusticeNoPeace
Mar 2015
#66
I havent even looked at it or thought about it, you are obsessed with proving the cops are
NoJusticeNoPeace
Mar 2015
#74
Wrong about what? Where did I say he did not shoot the cop? Or did I say I wont believe he did
NoJusticeNoPeace
Mar 2015
#78
What you mean is who to believe, the cops or historical reality that they lie all the time
NoJusticeNoPeace
Mar 2015
#70
No, I don't believe everything they say, and I have called them out when they're wrong,
GGJohn
Mar 2015
#73
Brown? That would shock me, so you agree that Wilson created a situation that was NOt necessary
NoJusticeNoPeace
Mar 2015
#75
But an irrelevant 2009 DHS study said that RW extremists are the greatest threat to cops
DesMoinesDem
Mar 2015
#34
No one said that - The words 'I think' +'could have been' do not = 'only logical conclusion'
blm
Mar 2015
#98
A plea of " it was the wrong one[twice]" won't help the defendant, even if true.
Eleanors38
Mar 2015
#37