Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Lindsey Graham says Obama came close to cutting a "mini Simpson-Bowles deal" on Social Security [View all]Cha
(320,094 posts)20. Obama's budget rejects House Republicans' Social Security hostage-taking
President Obama's budget does not include any Social Security "reforms" this time around. In fact, it includes an implicit challenge to Republicans who hope to manufacture a crisis in the program.
Obama's budget included the transfer of tax revenue from the program's retirement fund to the disability fund, which would otherwise start being unable to pay full benefits in late 2016. House Republicans passed a rule in January that would block the transferknown as reallocationunless Social Security's overall solvency was improved. [ ]
While Obama's budget acknowledges that reallocation can coincide with "a longer-term solution to overall Social Security solvency (being) developed with the Congress," its proposal is a clean reallocation with no strings attached. It also included a warning of sorts for any GOP proposals that would privatize or cut the program.
"Any reforms should strengthen retirement security for the most vulnerable, including low-income seniors, and should maintain robust disability and survivors benefits," the budget documents say. "The Administration will oppose any measures that privatize or weaken the Social Security system and will not accept an approach that slashes benefits for future generations or reduces basic benefits for current beneficiaries."[/div]
MOre..
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/02/02/1361807/-Obama-s-budget-rejects-House-Republicans-Social-Security-nbsp-hostage-taking#
Obama's budget included the transfer of tax revenue from the program's retirement fund to the disability fund, which would otherwise start being unable to pay full benefits in late 2016. House Republicans passed a rule in January that would block the transferknown as reallocationunless Social Security's overall solvency was improved. [ ]
While Obama's budget acknowledges that reallocation can coincide with "a longer-term solution to overall Social Security solvency (being) developed with the Congress," its proposal is a clean reallocation with no strings attached. It also included a warning of sorts for any GOP proposals that would privatize or cut the program.
"Any reforms should strengthen retirement security for the most vulnerable, including low-income seniors, and should maintain robust disability and survivors benefits," the budget documents say. "The Administration will oppose any measures that privatize or weaken the Social Security system and will not accept an approach that slashes benefits for future generations or reduces basic benefits for current beneficiaries."[/div]
MOre..
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/02/02/1361807/-Obama-s-budget-rejects-House-Republicans-Social-Security-nbsp-hostage-taking#
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Lindsey Graham says Obama came close to cutting a "mini Simpson-Bowles deal" on Social Security [View all]
ND-Dem
Mar 2015
OP
There's that.. and also.. Obama's budget rejects House Republicans' Social Security hostage-taking
Cha
Mar 2015
#21
A sack of shit Republican who called WH officials "scumbags" is your source?
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#28
Precisely. ....and the idea that he should be taken at face value makes me puke. nt
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#58
Really. For once in his ****** Lying life.. he's going to tell the truth. Uh huh.. 'course there
Cha
Mar 2015
#19
This deal is well known, despite what the DU Revisionist History Team claims
MannyGoldstein
Mar 2015
#7
Yep, his offers to cut SS were widely reported and actually included in the 2014 WH budget proposal.
pa28
Mar 2015
#9
After Obama is out of office, progressives will post links about how they were almost right
alcibiades_mystery
Mar 2015
#45
what were the specifics of this mini Simpson Bowles deal that actually didn't work out?
Sheepshank
Mar 2015
#43
lovely linkys that still don't clarify what is meant by "mini Simpson Bowles"
Sheepshank
Mar 2015
#49