Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: “Surely we can agree that corporations don’t need taxpayers to subsidize massive CEO pay............ [View all]kairos12
(13,595 posts)5. CEOS are the true takers.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
65 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
“Surely we can agree that corporations don’t need taxpayers to subsidize massive CEO pay............ [View all]
marmar
Mar 2015
OP
My first thought as well! Based on pay this would affect less than 40% of the CEO's out there.
Amimnoch
Mar 2015
#8
The website suggests placing employees, lower level employees i presume, on the board of
JDPriestly
Mar 2015
#26
The suggestion is to require worker representation on the boards of directors.
JDPriestly
Mar 2015
#23
We probably need legislation that discourages huge stock options. They are bad for other
JDPriestly
Mar 2015
#40
No ... Of course I don't because I know something about compensation schemes ...
1StrongBlackMan
Mar 2015
#30
Do you know soemthing about compensation schemes like you know something about statistics?
LondonReign2
Mar 2015
#49
I always lean towards the over-arching notion that it IS INDEED up to government to step in when
calimary
Mar 2015
#34
Seems to me it comes down to the basic premise of things that the individual cannot do for himself
calimary
Mar 2015
#39
Should apply to any making over $500K, no corporate deduction as a business expense
bigbrother05
Mar 2015
#21
Hell the company should be denied "any" tax deductions if there is a massive gap in pay vs the
cstanleytech
Mar 2015
#53