General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: As my first OP (and I'm not even sure I can get my point across properly) [View all]whereisjustice
(2,941 posts)And Weiner? It's an interesting question but I just don't care to research it at this point..
If the top law enforcement officer of NY wants to allow legal/unionized sex workers (which I am inclined to favor) that would be different. He shouldn't be AG. But given well established organized crime links to illegal escort agencies, he was foolish. Next time perhaps he'll find a sex mate without all the associated legal baggage and conflicts of interest. His job is 24/7 unfortunately.
As far as Clintons? I can't add anything to what I already said except in Bill's case, it is the oldest trick in the book for opponents to use a sex foil to embarrass or steal information from senior executives in government. Really, really stupid. And at the "office".