Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BlueMTexpat

(15,653 posts)
93. Welcome to DU!
Mon Mar 16, 2015, 01:12 PM
Mar 2015

A lot of what happened to generate well-being for many in the US and in Europe post-WWII was because most world leaders espoused Keynesian economic theories in varying degrees and implemented them in their national and international policies.

Those theories worked well for the most part, and with tweaking would have worked even more to make this world a better place. Unfortunately, the rise of Milton Friedman's "Chicago School" and the insidious RW anti-Keynesian theories that were espoused, even enshrined, by the likes of Greenspan, etc., as well as the rise of the theory that a corporation's purpose is to enrich its shareholders above all else - no matter what consequences to other stakeholders - have changed the US from the shining economic and political model that it used to be in the mid-20th century into a parable to be avoided. Things were not perfect then, especially for women and minorities, but Johnson's signature of civil rights legislation was a huge step forward. Humphrey would have continued those policies and added to them.

Unfortunately, the war was disastrous to Humphrey's future as a candidate. Even with that horrible albatross around his neck, he had gained momentum in the latter stages of the campaign. Had Election Day occurred even a week later, it is possible that the outcome might have been different. But life is full of "what ifs" ... unfortunately.

The election of Richard Nixon in 1968 was at a key moment for US history and tragically, we made the wrong decision, as was the case again in 1980 with Reagan. Among other long lasting consequences, it enabled the rise, spread, mainstreaming and adoption of Friedman's theories - and also many disastrous foreign policy decisions - that later not only enabled the rise of Reagan - but of shadowy amoral figures such as the Kochs, et al. All have resulted in the disastrous economic and foreign policies this nation pursues today.

But this is why even today, we must ALL keep our eyes on the long term, because the two parties are NOT alike. No GOPer Presidential candidate is acceptable. NONE. EVER.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Thank you. When I read (I guess some younger posters) write and say Nixon wasn't that bad OKNancy Mar 2015 #1
I was about to say those are not mutually exclusive options. Thor_MN Mar 2015 #9
By body count, he is.We hated his guts.The Berrigans, the Chicago Eight, the protestor deaths ancianita Mar 2015 #15
I totally agree about BlueMTexpat Mar 2015 #22
he didn't normalize relations with prc; that was a corporate decision. Capital needed ND-Dem Mar 2015 #58
He made the initial overtures BlueMTexpat Mar 2015 #77
One point that must be made about Nixon is that, unlike Raygun hifiguy Mar 2015 #94
he was all those things, but his domestic policies were more liberal than reagan's -- ND-Dem Mar 2015 #31
He never did anything without political calculation. OKNancy Mar 2015 #33
you can say the same of 99% of politicians. He did them, regardless. Unlike the ND-Dem Mar 2015 #35
I can't believe you think Nixon is liberal compared to Bill Clinton. Rex Mar 2015 #52
I can't believe you think bill is a liberal. Are you old enough to have been cognizant ND-Dem Mar 2015 #53
Duh. Rex Mar 2015 #54
i'll take that as a no. ND-Dem Mar 2015 #56
I'm sure you will, what you won't do is explain how Nixon was a liberal. Rex Mar 2015 #57
Nixon was a politician. Nixon's policies were more liberal than anything around today. ND-Dem Mar 2015 #59
Nixon kept us in the Viet Nam war shadowmayor Mar 2015 #50
strictly speaking, we left vietnam during nixon's watch, ergo he got us out of vietnam. ND-Dem Mar 2015 #55
Yeah, Nixon "gave" us the EPA Art_from_Ark Mar 2015 #69
Everything there is just previous policy implementation. joshcryer Mar 2015 #61
Nixon appointees were 44% of that Court & 1/3 of the votes for Roe were from Nixon ND-Dem Mar 2015 #88
I don't think that credits the policy process. joshcryer Mar 2015 #89
the clintons failed to pass health care. should we then call obamacare 'clintoncare' instead? ND-Dem Mar 2015 #90
No, but we can say Obama continued the policy work. joshcryer Mar 2015 #91
we call it obamacare and say obama passed it. but you won't give nixon credit for ND-Dem Mar 2015 #92
Nixon was a right-wing criminal and he was in no way, shape, or form a liberal. At all. Period. NYC Liberal Mar 2015 #70
tell me which great society programs he gutted. and you're wrong about the SC nominees. ND-Dem Mar 2015 #84
He did those things because that was the political landscape he had to deal with JHB Mar 2015 #75
The fact that he overthrew Allende in Chile, bombed Laos, thwarted Johnson's peace talks, deutsey Mar 2015 #79
obviously, and i'm not hailing his accomplishments. i'm mourning our present predicament, ND-Dem Mar 2015 #81
Touche deutsey Mar 2015 #82
The failure to prosecute "conservative" traitors has haunted the country since 1865 Doctor_J Mar 2015 #2
I have a couple of more to add. I remember my rage virgogal Mar 2015 #6
Question bobclark86 Mar 2015 #8
You are not alone. bread_and_roses Mar 2015 #28
the problem is.... tomp Mar 2015 #71
+100. the country's gone nuts, imo. ND-Dem Mar 2015 #32
indeed. we have people who think treason should go unpunished. Doctor_J Mar 2015 #46
Nutty is saying we should execute almost every Republican President since Eisenhower Cali_Democrat Mar 2015 #48
i think advocating for the execution of political enemies is nuttier ND-Dem Mar 2015 #63
Fine, life in prison, then. I'm not big on the death penalty either. n/t nomorenomore08 Mar 2015 #37
Bin Laden and Sadam were executed so they would not be able to talk. PowerToThePeople Mar 2015 #96
You're a supporter of the death penalty? Cali_Democrat Mar 2015 #14
only for treason, and I'd be fine with life at hard labor. But 18 months at a country Doctor_J Mar 2015 #45
How exactly would you have proposed we imprison Scalia? Cali_Democrat Mar 2015 #47
Agree, if we need gitmo it's to hold traitorous bastards like Oliver North, Rove, Rice and Cheney. whereisjustice Mar 2015 #17
treason winetourdriver Mar 2015 #18
, blkmusclmachine Mar 2015 #3
Powerful article gwheezie Mar 2015 #4
We got fooled, and it wasn't even different sons of bitches. phantom power Mar 2015 #20
Yes, the people in charge Unknown Beatle Mar 2015 #43
Oh they learned from the past. Very selfish and partisan lessons. stillwaiting Mar 2015 #67
HUGE K & R !!! - Thank You !!! WillyT Mar 2015 #5
I wish I could rec this more than once. n/t Martin Eden Mar 2015 #7
Robert Kennedy would have won the 1968 Presidential Election but was assasinated in the sping of 68. jalan48 Mar 2015 #10
Not necessarily OnlinePoker Mar 2015 #13
Kennedy had the momentum and the charisma-Humphrey was as exciting as a washrag jalan48 Mar 2015 #19
Humphrey was unfairly maligned then - and apparently still - and BlueMTexpat Mar 2015 #23
By today's standards, yes, Humphrey would be a Progressive. However, he was a mainstream Democrat in jalan48 Mar 2015 #25
Well - I was there then and remember it well. BlueMTexpat Mar 2015 #27
I was there as well. jalan48 Mar 2015 #30
Still miss Bobby Kennedy AikenYankee Mar 2015 #34
I agree. jalan48 Mar 2015 #36
Did you see him after MLK assassination ? AikenYankee Mar 2015 #40
It was right before. jalan48 Mar 2015 #42
We agree about much more than we disagree, BlueMTexpat Mar 2015 #78
Yes we do agree on most things I am sure :) jalan48 Mar 2015 #80
Welcome to DU! BlueMTexpat Mar 2015 #93
Thank you! jalan48 Mar 2015 #95
I agree totally with you on your discription... malokvale77 Mar 2015 #38
Yes, Hubert's positions were considered mainstream for a Democrat dflprincess Mar 2015 #44
This is, BY FAR, the best thing I've read on the subject. eggplant Mar 2015 #11
Wish I could rec this a thousand tiimes. CanonRay Mar 2015 #12
kick samsingh Mar 2015 #16
Nixon was a psychotic monster gregcrawford Mar 2015 #21
Richard Nixon never worked for Joe McCarthy. I think you are conflating Nixon's participation in the KingCharlemagne Mar 2015 #49
A VERY important point BrotherIvan Mar 2015 #24
Richard Nixon was a weasel. He set the mold for Republicans to come. Enthusiast Mar 2015 #26
He was an AMATEUR. Orsino Mar 2015 #73
True. Enthusiast Mar 2015 #74
Until we start prosecuting conservative traitors, it will be same shit, different day. Initech Mar 2015 #29
It wouldn't hurt to boot them from... malokvale77 Mar 2015 #39
Some of us from that era also believe Nixon had Bobby whacked. Spitfire of ATJ Mar 2015 #41
Some of us from that era... malokvale77 Mar 2015 #51
Well, we were also called "Conspiracy Theorists" to talk about the Trilateral Commission.... Spitfire of ATJ Mar 2015 #60
We still are called that. malokvale77 Mar 2015 #62
some from that era don't get that presidents are just hired hands; they don't ND-Dem Mar 2015 #64
Johnson's girl-friend at the time.. Joe Chi Minh Mar 2015 #68
oooh, johnson's girlfriend. i'm sure she was let in on all the inside dope. ND-Dem Mar 2015 #85
It was when he came out of the meeting, Dum Dum. Joe Chi Minh Mar 2015 #98
right, "dumdum." your manner of discourse certainly makes *you* a believable source. ND-Dem Mar 2015 #99
Only on RT..... Spitfire of ATJ Mar 2015 #72
keep dreaming. ND-Dem Mar 2015 #86
amazing read. My husband went into Vietnam in June 1968, the worst year of my life....... secondwind Mar 2015 #65
K & R. The right wing cheats and lies about everything because their policies can't win the GoneFishin Mar 2015 #66
When will it be enough for us? merrily Mar 2015 #76
K&R plus a gazillion. love_katz Mar 2015 #83
Kick,kick,kicked&Recommended! butterfly77 Mar 2015 #87
I've followed this thread and hesitated to comment umtil now pinboy3niner Mar 2015 #97
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"We haven’t bled eno...»Reply #93