Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Putin says Russia was ready to activate nuclear arsenal over Crimea [View all]Man from Pickens
(1,713 posts)47. We've been doing exactly that for years
http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2006/04/iran-a13.html
and we're not the only ones - Israel makes nuclear threats regularly
and India has done the same (against Pakistan):
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2013/05/10/shay-m10.html
So has Pakistan (against India).
And believe it or not, China has made this same threat against the US (multiple times). If you don't read international news sources like I do, you probably weren't aware of it. Here's an example http://www.asianresearch.org/articles/2718.html
Your conception of a world without overt nuclear threats between nuclear states and also against non-nuclear states is not even slightly correct. Every nation which has nukes (possibly excepting France) has threatened to use them in at least one specific circumstance directly tied to what it views as its vital security interests.
and we're not the only ones - Israel makes nuclear threats regularly
and India has done the same (against Pakistan):
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2013/05/10/shay-m10.html
So has Pakistan (against India).
And believe it or not, China has made this same threat against the US (multiple times). If you don't read international news sources like I do, you probably weren't aware of it. Here's an example http://www.asianresearch.org/articles/2718.html
Your conception of a world without overt nuclear threats between nuclear states and also against non-nuclear states is not even slightly correct. Every nation which has nukes (possibly excepting France) has threatened to use them in at least one specific circumstance directly tied to what it views as its vital security interests.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
putin should be man enough to accept his respondibility in the Crimea dealings.
Thinkingabout
Mar 2015
#1
When the Kiev government has actual Neo-Nazis in the coalition, "Fascist" is impossible to deny
Man from Pickens
Mar 2015
#25
Again, what does any of this have to do with Putin's insane crap about using nukes?
cali
Mar 2015
#29
It's quite simple and even more convenient to pretend that concern for A denies concern for B.
LanternWaste
Mar 2015
#28
really? I certainly haven't said we should bomb ISIS. I've been very vocal in opposing
cali
Mar 2015
#35
I have never said nor implied that the US is the only bad actor on the world stage
Man from Pickens
Mar 2015
#48
they pretty much just ignore anything that doesn't fit with their chosen narrative
cali
Mar 2015
#22
Given Russia's behavior towards former Soviet republics not aligned with NATO
NuclearDem
Mar 2015
#32
So promises made by a U.S. Secretary of State are worthess? Check. - nt
KingCharlemagne
Mar 2015
#45
Given the history of Western countries and Russia negotiating spheres of influence
NuclearDem
Mar 2015
#49
It was darkly hilarious that it remained for that inveterate warmonger Kissinger to
KingCharlemagne
Mar 2015
#46