Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Obama: No Permanent Bases In Afghanistan [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)47. Well,
it's one thing to be "cynical," and another thing entirely to use cynicism as a basis for refuting what the President stated.
As for this:
But the reality of the situation on the ground for the next ten years or so will be that we will be operating over there: Special Operations missions will still be executed; our troops that work with and train the ANA will continue to be executed and targeted by them; and, at the end of the day it will be for nothing permanent.
Do you think we are out of Iraq? I flew home with guys from FT Hood who were there doing route clearance (basically driving up and down roads waiting to get lit up by an IED) in Baghdad. Were they doing "combat missions"?
Do you think we are out of Iraq? I flew home with guys from FT Hood who were there doing route clearance (basically driving up and down roads waiting to get lit up by an IED) in Baghdad. Were they doing "combat missions"?
...again, that's more speculation based on your cynicism. You use Iraq as an example, but American troops aren't being "executed and targeted" in Iraq. The official end of the war was four months ago.
It's likely the Afghan war will end in a similar fashion.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The number of our troops in harm’s way has been cut in half, and more will be coming home soon
pasto76
May 2012
#14
Wasn't the surge in troops that Obama approved intended for Froward Operating Bases?
bluestate10
May 2012
#40
How does "be fully responsible for the security of their country" transmute into...
PoliticAverse
May 2012
#41
That's right I didn't. I just clicked on the op's links which didn't include the quote
PoliticAverse
May 2012
#44