Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Dan Rather on G. W. Bush report: ‘We reported a true story—that’s why I’m no longer with CBS News' [View all]countryjake
(8,554 posts)40. Yeah, it was dismissed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killian_documents_controversy
Dan Rather's lawsuit against CBS/Viacom
On September 19, 2007, Dan Rather filed a $70 million lawsuit against CBS and its former corporate parent, Viacom, claiming they had made him a "scapegoat" over the controversy caused by the 2004 "60 Minutes Wednesday" report that featured the Killian documents.[116] The suit names as defendants: CBS and its CEO, Leslie Moonves; Viacom, Sumner Redstone, chairman of both Viacom and CBS Corporation; and Andrew Heyward, the former president of CBS News.[117]
In January, 2008, the legal teams for Dan Rather and CBS reached an agreement to produce for Rather's attorneys "virtually all of the materials" related to the case, including the findings of Erik T. Rigler's report to CBS about the documents and the story.[118]
On September 29, 2009 New York State Appeals Court dismissed Dan Rather's lawsuit and stated that the lower court should have honored CBS's request to throw out the entire lawsuit instead of just throwing out parts.[119]
And this, from Mary Mapes:
Dan Rather's New Courage: A Hefty Lawsuit Against CBS
http://www.alternet.org/media/63269/dan_rather's_new_courage%3A_a_hefty_lawsuit_against_cbs/?page=1
Mapes had her career as a journalist virtually destroyed by this...I just tried googling to find an article she wrote back when the case was dismissed, but I only got like four pages (and counting) of hits from right wing-nut sites, condemning her. Sigh.
Dan Rather's lawsuit against CBS/Viacom
On September 19, 2007, Dan Rather filed a $70 million lawsuit against CBS and its former corporate parent, Viacom, claiming they had made him a "scapegoat" over the controversy caused by the 2004 "60 Minutes Wednesday" report that featured the Killian documents.[116] The suit names as defendants: CBS and its CEO, Leslie Moonves; Viacom, Sumner Redstone, chairman of both Viacom and CBS Corporation; and Andrew Heyward, the former president of CBS News.[117]
In January, 2008, the legal teams for Dan Rather and CBS reached an agreement to produce for Rather's attorneys "virtually all of the materials" related to the case, including the findings of Erik T. Rigler's report to CBS about the documents and the story.[118]
On September 29, 2009 New York State Appeals Court dismissed Dan Rather's lawsuit and stated that the lower court should have honored CBS's request to throw out the entire lawsuit instead of just throwing out parts.[119]
And this, from Mary Mapes:
Dan Rather's New Courage: A Hefty Lawsuit Against CBS
http://www.alternet.org/media/63269/dan_rather's_new_courage%3A_a_hefty_lawsuit_against_cbs/?page=1
Mapes had her career as a journalist virtually destroyed by this...I just tried googling to find an article she wrote back when the case was dismissed, but I only got like four pages (and counting) of hits from right wing-nut sites, condemning her. Sigh.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
89 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Dan Rather on G. W. Bush report: ‘We reported a true story—that’s why I’m no longer with CBS News' [View all]
marmar
May 2012
OP
Rather has always had a reputation for integrity... I'd take his word over most
1monster
May 2012
#2
"Truth and Duty: The Press, the President, and the Privilege of Power" by Mary Mapes
Bozita
May 2012
#32
Unfortunately, if you're stuck with using the "my evidence has never been PROVEN a fake"
hughee99
May 2012
#47
I don't think it was ever in doubt. He is owed a huge public apology, but that would take integrity
sabrina 1
May 2012
#6
Jeez, as a Neocon and friend of the Bushes, you'd think he's throw a little more $$ to repukes
hughee99
May 2012
#45
I wonder what we could have done better to help that story come out in a timely fashion,
Baitball Blogger
May 2012
#12
I felt the same as you. I bet that if that took place today the outcome might be different.
Ninga
May 2012
#16
I feel the same. And with the NYPD and other police depts at the corporations' beck and call...
October
May 2012
#76
the problem is not a whole lot better today- the dominance of RW talk radio in managing the
certainot
May 2012
#80
I remember the typeset threads. But that gif you posted seems far from conclusive.
Gregorian
May 2012
#29
That was my impression at the time. I was on DU the night the 60 Minutes story aired.
yardwork
May 2012
#39
it was my experience, from the 70's on, if Dan Rather said it was true, it was true.
Greybnk48
May 2012
#21
Rather and Cronkite were the only 2 reporters that spoke to the truth. You could put your
southernyankeebelle
May 2012
#31
Just because you have heard both sides to a story, doesn't mean you have heard the truth.
harun
May 2012
#33
"Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." K&R n/t
Egalitarian Thug
May 2012
#72