Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

MadHound

(34,179 posts)
6. Your outrage is duly noted
Wed May 2, 2012, 07:52 PM
May 2012

Meanwhile you conveniently left out the part about, "American military officials say that the planning figure is 25,000 troops, commanded by a three-star general. They would include trainers as well as thousands of Green Berets and other special operations troops who would work with Afghans on counter-terror missions. NATO would be asked to contribute troops, but it's likely that the U.S. would contribute the bulk of those forces."

When you have plans that call for tens of thousands of troops, commanded by a three star general, you can be pretty damn certain that will come to pass. You know that, I know that, most of the country knows that. Hell fifty five years ago a president warned us all about that.

But the fact that Obama is just as much in thrall to the MIC as the rest of our post-WWII presidents simply galls you. Meanwhile, the proof in dead and wounded continue to prove your denials wrong.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»About 25,000 Troops May B...»Reply #6