Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
33. For anyone wanting to slice and dice it, there are six measurements from the Dept of Labor's bureau
Thu Mar 19, 2015, 12:05 AM
Mar 2015

of labor and statistics. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t15.htm

U-6 includes everyone except those that have done absolutely nothing to try to find a job for 365 days or more. Right now U-6 is at 11%.

There are folks who will try to tell you that there are tons of people out there who desperately want a job but who have not tried at all in any way to find one in the last 12 months. I think that number of people is extremely small. If included it might raise the U-6 number to 11.2% at most.

In general, if you want to use the most broad measure possible, U-6 is a good number to use. But again, its only good by itself. Using it to compare performance of this administration to previous ones is apples and oranges.

FYI, when you look at the above linked chart, U-3 is the official unemployment rate.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

So she wants us to be more like Canada? Kalidurga Mar 2015 #1
She probably pulled that number out of thin air. subterranean Mar 2015 #2
She pulled this turd out of where all the con liars's pull "facts" out of..... Fred Sanders Mar 2015 #14
Or out of... 3catwoman3 Mar 2015 #38
It's the new Repuke math Politicalboi Mar 2015 #3
Whether or not the numbers are incomplete that is how unemployment has been measured "forever"... DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #5
Comparing apples to maple syrup...there is no end to the crazy train. Fred Sanders Mar 2015 #16
No, that's not true. hedda_foil Mar 2015 #31
she must be on drugs PowerToThePeople Mar 2015 #4
There is absolutely no way Canada's real unemployment is a nearly a quarter of ours... DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #7
your math is wrong PowerToThePeople Mar 2015 #10
How is my math wrong? DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #12
you are doing it backwards PowerToThePeople Mar 2015 #13
She said and I quote if we measured unemployment like Canada counts their unemployment rate DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #22
the 2008 recession PowerToThePeople Mar 2015 #25
show stats on that claim PowerToThePeople Mar 2015 #18
Productivity growth is around two, two and one half percent or so. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #24
productivity PowerToThePeople Mar 2015 #27
You have to look at it year by year: DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #29
no, because your chart obscures compound effects PowerToThePeople Mar 2015 #32
She's sort of right unrepentant progress Mar 2015 #6
Canada's official unemployment rate doesn't include "passive" job seekers but it does.. Spazito Mar 2015 #26
Okay then, what was the employment under Bush? brooklynite Mar 2015 #8
Maybe it is because Canada has a national health insurance. I doubt Canada wants Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #9
Well! TlalocW Mar 2015 #11
Maybe she doesn't move here because ... NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #17
Conservative book clubs buy up her books. It's a scam. Agnosticsherbet Mar 2015 #30
I know. NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #37
That was the first thing that came to her mind after she ordered a Canadian bacon pizza. Major Hogwash Mar 2015 #15
LOL, she was sure Canada fought in Vietnam too.. Spazito Mar 2015 #19
That was the first thing I thought of, too. :) nt pinboy3niner Mar 2015 #35
She was in the Arts school MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #20
Ahh, take off, eh?! JHB Mar 2015 #21
Yes and when Bush was president it would have been 38% Doctor_J Mar 2015 #23
I get it...If you stop looking you are no longer counted. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #28
Did you mean to call her a man's name? n/t tammywammy Mar 2015 #36
For anyone wanting to slice and dice it, there are six measurements from the Dept of Labor's bureau stevenleser Mar 2015 #33
rec PowerToThePeople Mar 2015 #34
I would be interested to see how many jobs are part time, and how much jobs are paying, djean111 Mar 2015 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ann Coulter said if we me...»Reply #33