General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: BREAKING: President Obama Wants To Propose 'Mandatory Voting.' It would change everything. [View all]jeff47
(26,549 posts)Brown raised far less than his two opponents. He won.
Money is only very powerful in races where people do not hear much about the candidates. As you reach higher and higher into politics, money has a weaker and weaker effect.
So money is a big factor for statehouses and the House of Representatives. It is less of a factor in governorships and Senators. It has very little power in a Presidential contest. Obama's and Romney's spending changed virtually no one's opinion about them.
The media likes covering money because 1) They get the money and 2) it's an impartial metric they can pretend is meaningful.
As soon as you start requiring people to pass some sort of test in order to vote, you open the doors to screwing with that test. "We want to make sure you're not an ignorant voter, so explain Ayn Rand's philosophy".
People aren't as dumb as you seem to believe. We just haven't had a liberal party tap into what they want for several decades, which has turned off a large chunk of the electorate.