Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Give Edward Snowden the Same Deal General Petraeus Got for Leaking Info [View all]bigtree
(94,541 posts)165. I gave you the wrong Ellsberg quote, but you're off-base and need some perspective
you:
"Anyone who says Snowden is a whistle blower does not present creditability."
I don't care who you think you were talking to, you're spouting cheap pablum in your attempt to discredit Snowden as a whistleblower. Your posts in this thread are pedantic and betray a complete disregard for the issues behind the revelations.
Take some time to read what a person who most people recognize as a whistleblower has to say about Snowden...
Daniel Ellsberg:
In my estimation, there has not been in American history a more important leak than Edward Snowdens release of NSA material and that definitely includes the Pentagon Papers 40 years ago. Snowdens whistleblowing gives us the possibility to roll back a key part of what has amounted to an executive coup against the US constitution.
Since 9/11, there has been, at first secretly but increasingly openly, a revocation of the bill of rights for which this country fought over 200 years ago. In particular, the fourth and fifth amendments of the US constitution, which safeguard citizens from unwarranted intrusion by the government into their private lives, have been virtually suspended.
In 1975, Senator Frank Church spoke of the National Security Agency in these terms:I know the capacity that is there to make tyranny total in America, and we must see to it that this agency and all agencies that possess this technology operate within the law and under proper supervision, so that we never cross over that abyss. That is the abyss from which there is no return.
The dangerous prospect of which he warned was that Americas intelligence gathering capability which is today beyond any comparison with what existed in his pre-digital era at any time could be turned around on the American people and no American would have any privacy left.
That has now happened. That is what Snowden has exposed, with official, secret documents. The NSA, FBI and CIA have, with the new digital technology, surveillance powers over our own citizens that the Stasi the secret police in the former democratic republic of East Germany could scarcely have dreamed of. Snowden reveals that the so-called intelligence community has become the United Stasi of America.
...with Edward Snowden having put his life on the line to get this information out, quite possibly inspiring others with similar knowledge, conscience and patriotism to show comparable civil courage in the public, in Congress, in the executive branch itself
more...
....theres no question in my mind that he is a whistle-blower in the best, complete sense. And he left the country and he did it for good reason.
In my case, as I said, there was a different country 40 years ago, where I was able to speak for so long. The things that were done against me, which included trying to incapacitate me totally at the orders of the White House, in other words, assault me or kill me, those were illegal then. And in fact they faced President Nixon with impeachment proceedings and led to his resignation. Thats very different. All the things that were done to me then including CIA profile on me, a burglary of my former psychiatrists office in order to get information to blackmail me with, all of those things were illegal, as one might think that they ought to be. Theyre legal now, since 9/11, with the Patriot Act, which on that very basis alone should be repealed. In other words, this is a case right now with Snowden that shows very dramatically the dangers of that Patriot Act used as it is. So the fact is that all these things are legal. And even the one of possibly eliminating him.
more...
I definitely have a new hero in Edward Snowden, the first one since Bradley Manning, and Im glad it didnt take another 40 years. People who respect or admire what I did, they may not realize it right now, but before this is over, theyll recognize that he deserves great admiration. And people who hate what I did, can hate.
...babbling on this thread like a government mouthpiece makes you look foolish alongside men like Daniel Ellsberg. You've lost all credibility here, despite insisting that Snowden has none.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
179 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Give Edward Snowden the Same Deal General Petraeus Got for Leaking Info [View all]
bigtree
Mar 2015
OP
These are two different cases, Petraeus did not provide files to news sources.
Thinkingabout
Mar 2015
#3
"gave classified info to the American people"....and China, and Russia, and who knows who else.
George II
Mar 2015
#49
Shine a light on dirty little deeds, deeds like those addressed in a law passed in
Thinkingabout
Mar 2015
#86
That's a very good point - Petraeus faced his accusers and admitted what he did...
George II
Mar 2015
#51
Manning's a whistleblower. No. I don't think her "Crime" warrants this sentence.
riderinthestorm
Mar 2015
#88
I thought you knew what crime Manning was charged with but here is the info
Thinkingabout
Mar 2015
#89
that's what most people regard as whistleblowing; exposing government wrongdoing
bigtree
Mar 2015
#93
I got it, I can commit crimes, claim it is whistle blower. Just think we would not
Thinkingabout
Mar 2015
#94
I'll assert that if you insist failure to read them was the basis for her conviction
bigtree
Mar 2015
#131
I consider that a minor point in the broader questions surrounding her dissemination of information
bigtree
Mar 2015
#142
Correction. Snowden did not 'run off to Russia' and everytime someone makes that false
sabrina 1
Mar 2015
#143
Now once again, the facts. The US Govt stranded Snowden in Russia. On his way to S.America
sabrina 1
Mar 2015
#173
The false claim of Snowden revealing information brought about a law in 2008,
Thinkingabout
Mar 2015
#150
I gave you the wrong Ellsberg quote, but you're off-base and need some perspective
bigtree
Mar 2015
#165
most of us don't require a government act to define who we feel are whistleblowers
bigtree
Mar 2015
#169
No, YOU stick to facts. First, a majority of the American people view Snowden as a Whistle Blower.
sabrina 1
Mar 2015
#174
the poster is clearly talking about what most regard as 'whistleblowing,' not the flawed law
bigtree
Mar 2015
#176
You say I have a reading comprehension and you come back with a flawed legistration
Thinkingabout
Mar 2015
#178
Thank you, excellent post. I have posted polls on this before, and wasnt about to go wasting time
sabrina 1
Mar 2015
#179
his leaks were the only impetus for the calls for reform of the intelligence system today
bigtree
Mar 2015
#16
the US government is behaving like a communist nation in its pursuit and prosecution of the man
bigtree
Mar 2015
#17
And should he receive some of the same punishment given by the Russian authorities
Thinkingabout
Mar 2015
#24
I have been in a position in which I couldhave been charged with espionage,
Thinkingabout
Mar 2015
#85
The soul of a 72-year old with the mind of someone much, much younger.
DisgustipatedinCA
Mar 2015
#47
That's my position: I'm not against a similar deal on the similar charges
alcibiades_mystery
Mar 2015
#100
Lol! Nice try but no dice. When your options are Manning's treatment or Drakes
riderinthestorm
Mar 2015
#81
Ben Wizner is not a criminal defense attorney. He is not listed on the federal docket
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#139
Go ahead and tell Snowden to complain about Wizner to the bar association
riderinthestorm
Mar 2015
#147
Why would Snowden complain about Wizner? Look, the lawyer he should be complaining about is
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#152
Petraeus gave the names of covert agents and conversations with the President
neverforget
Mar 2015
#82
Lots of people accuse Snowden of lying. No one, I mean NO ONE, can back those claims.
DisgustipatedinCA
Mar 2015
#48
Because the Chinese and Russians would be motivated to announce their advantage?
MADem
Mar 2015
#107
So your opinion is that its just mere speculation? Then what do you think the odds are?
7962
Mar 2015
#125
If Patreus doesn't have to sit his days out in prison, than neither should Manning.
MohRokTah
Mar 2015
#102
First off Manning isnt a traitor nor are Patreus or Snowden unless one of them gave
cstanleytech
Mar 2015
#103
I disagreed with the deal Petraeus was given and I disagree with giving Snowden a similar deal.
cstanleytech
Mar 2015
#43
I'm fairly certain an offer is probably on the table for Snowden and has been all along...
Chan790
Mar 2015
#57
What exactly would they prosecute Julian Assange for? He isnt an american citizen and if he wasnt in
cstanleytech
Mar 2015
#105
Yeah I just heard a few heads exploding from the logic of that and no way to refute it.
Rex
Mar 2015
#75
No--Petraeus wasn't charged by the military because he was CIA head when the offenses took place. nt
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#159
Yep. The authoritarians gravitate to the side with the most official sounding title.
GoneFishin
Mar 2015
#137
Snowden's act of whislteblowing has made a significant positive impact for American Citizens
2banon
Mar 2015
#153
Issue Snowden a uniform and a chest covered with tinware and it would be a done deal. K&R
Tierra_y_Libertad
Mar 2015
#164