Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: To Believe Julian Assange, You Must Believe Israel Shamir, Vicious Anti-Semite and Liar. [View all]geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)105. Shamir claims he wrote for Haaretz.
Given his status as a chronic liar and Holocaust denier, maybe not a credible claim.
He is as much of a repulsive Jew-hating bigot as many sentenced at Nuremberg. A quick google check will verify this.
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Israel_Shamir
According to Shamir, the Jews are to blame for pretty much everything. He claims that the reason the mainstream press often takes sides with Israel is because the "rich Jews buy media so it will cover up their (and their brethren's) misdeeds. The Jews in the media are giving protection to the rich Jews. ... In the US, even in Western Europe, no view can be proposed to the general public unless approved (after being vetted and corrected) by a Jewish group."[4] He believes that there exists a vast Jewish conspiracy pushing for global hegemony, writing that, "Palestine is not the ultimate goal of the Jews; the world is. Palestine is just the place for world state headquarters; necessary, for otherwise the people of Europe wouldn't be magnetised like a rabbit in the headlights of a car."[5] A Russian-language book by Shamir, published in 2010, hawked The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.
Shamir has written in defense of the Holocaust-denying pseudo-historian David Irving, saying that he was persecuted for his "denial of Jewish superiority", adding that, "Not only is Western Christian civilisation dead, but even its successor, secular European civilisation, has met its demise only a few days after its proud and last celebration by the Danish scribes. It was short-lived: about two hundred years from beginning to the end, the Europeans may once have had the illusion that they can live without an ideological supremacy. Now this illusion is over; and the Jews came in the stead of the old and tired See of St Peter to rule over the minds and souls of Europeans."[6]
Shamir was also booked as a speaker at the International Conference to Review the Global Vision of the Holocaust, the infamous Tehran gathering of anti-Semites and Holocaust deniers convened by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's government in 2006. He shared the stage with Horst Mahler, a Neo-Nazi lawyer from Germany.[7] Shamir later spoke glowingly of the conference, saying that, "Nobody and I do mean nobody, including British, French, American, German, Russian leaders really cares about the victims of a war long past, Jewish or otherwise; they pay tribute to the Holocaust as nations pay tribute to their vanquisher." He also wrote that the official narrative of the Holocaust serves as "a justification of [rich and powerful] minority rights over [oppressed] majority needs."[8] In a 2011 interview the Jewish Tablet magazine, Shamir repeatedly refused to acknowledge the atrocities committed at Auschwitz.[9] Elsewhere, he has described Auschwitz as "an internment facility, attended by the Red Cross."
Regular contributor to Counterpunch. Which says all that needs to be said about Counterpunch.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
255 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
To Believe Julian Assange, You Must Believe Israel Shamir, Vicious Anti-Semite and Liar. [View all]
msanthrope
Mar 2015
OP
You are welcome. It really is a very simple issue--either you believe that there's a worldwide
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#7
Nah, msanthrope is reporting on what is happening with Julian Assange right now.. if you choose to
Cha
Mar 2015
#157
Rape is a felony in Sweden, and that's what the women accused him or raping them. Forcible sex
pnwmom
Mar 2015
#179
Thank you for all your work putting this together. Those women deserve their day in court. n/t
pnwmom
Mar 2015
#178
I think the term "concierge justice" was used to describe the treatment some here
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#198
So sad, too. That people slurp up 1960s era propaganda. Thank Hank I had parents that taught me to
Luminous Animal
Mar 2015
#100
True>>> Exclusive New Docs Throw Doubt on Julian Assange Rape Charges in Stockholm
avaistheone1
Jul 2016
#250
What a desperate jumbled stinking pile of non sequiturs, drivel logic, and false dichotomies.
GoneFishin
Mar 2015
#3
He is a disgusting individual who has pulled the wool over the eyes of a lot of
Matterate
Mar 2015
#4
Don't read any Polanski rape apologia threads on here. They are vomit inducing. nt
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#6
I'm of the opinion that repeated linkage to certain types of sources indicates that you share those
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#9
That's why I don't bother to attack the messenger, but try to understand the message.
Octafish
Mar 2015
#40
Being a proven liar does diminish the probability you should be believed. Being an anti-Semite does,
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#16
I didn't discuss that in the OP Octa. I discussed the charges against him. And I'm not in a court
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#55
Who are you to decide that the women who accuse Assange should not see justice? nt
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#134
Absolutely.....I've had clients who point that out. Of course, as a criminal defense
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#145
You made a judgment about what "matters more." Who are you to judge that? nt
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#146
"Matters more for US democracy." It's like A Tribe Called Qwest, you say the whole thing
Scootaloo
Mar 2015
#153
with this crap you have him tried, convicted, sentenced and evidently want him drawn and quartered
hobbit709
Mar 2015
#13
Well, either you believe Assange's honeypot defense, or you don't. Do you, or don't you? nt
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#17
Even Assange's own defense? Wikileaks put forth this defense....and it's proven false. That
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#22
I found the claims difficult to believe due to the timing of the allegations
LittleBlue
Mar 2015
#34
I wouldn't assume she has a strong case against Assange. In fact, I would say he stands an
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#38
Probably. My confusion comes from the fact that the prosecutor says she could have
LittleBlue
Mar 2015
#56
This brought up an additional question that I thought you could answer for me
LittleBlue
Mar 2015
#140
I think Assange is basically a coward. I've had guilty clients fuck up completely minor sentencing
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#143
Indeed. Sentence first, trial later. And the ad hominem argument to discredit Assange's proven revelations is classic.
Fred Sanders
Mar 2015
#31
Israel Shamir is a Neo-Nazi piece of shit, and Assange's choice to associate with Neo-Nazi trash
geek tragedy
Mar 2015
#20
Really a Neo-Nazi who wrote for Haaretz? Oooooh kay. And ya know, I do not agree with
Luminous Animal
Mar 2015
#93
Can you cite anything he actually wrote for Haaretz? Rationalwiki cannot substantiate many of his
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#131
Counterpunch is left-wing, Zorra....and had no problem publishing the honeypot defense.
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#26
Well...how many are bail-jumping fugitives living in an Embassy and having press conferences?
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#71
"The DU right.."? Lame attempt to smear, Z. Assange gets facts reported on him and you call it
Cha
Mar 2015
#147
Yes, Precisely.. they're really quick with their personal insults.. that's all they have while
Cha
Mar 2015
#162
There is, very clearly, a DU right. It's not a smear, it's a stone cold fact. nt
Zorra
Mar 2015
#235
No, it's not a fact that those who disagree with you about assange are on the right. And, it's an a
Cha
Mar 2015
#242
Her blather reminds me of all the propaganda that I heard against civil rights activists in the 60s.
Luminous Animal
Mar 2015
#97
So Shamir, the liar, is to be believed over Wikileaks own spokesman, Kristinn Hrafnsson, who
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#114
She accuses you of "blather".. while "blathering".. lol they all have their thumbs in their
Cha
Mar 2015
#155
I miss HiPointDem on threads like this, don't you? I remember the time HiPointDem
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#205
Since when is it right-wing to support women being taken seriously when they make claims of rape
pnwmom
Mar 2015
#183
This is so obviously a false dichotomy that I will use it when I teach critical thinking.
Vattel
Mar 2015
#24
Is that what you think? The charges are false but not part of a CIA plot? Why do you not believe
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#35
What do you think of a defendant who flees the jurisdiction, and then has an employee put out such a
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#46
I didn't present a false dichotomy, Vattel.....I presented an uncomfortable moral question
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#58
Check out this piece I just found when I google Shamir and Assange.. two peas in pod..
Cha
Mar 2015
#189
I'm asking you if you speak for that poster. How do you know what is in their mind? nt
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#87
They have nothing.. so they resort to attacking with personal insults. Quite pathetic actually
Cha
Mar 2015
#164
right, that's what i said and that's certainly logical my you've outdone yourself
ND-Dem
Mar 2015
#184
Assange's character is not important to me. The crimes he exposed are. Any comment on the crimes?
Scuba
Mar 2015
#47
That's something for Swedish authorities to pursue, if they have sufficient evidence. However ...
Scuba
Mar 2015
#202
Nice try, but that's a fail. I made no reference to any alleged victims being short-shrifted.
Scuba
Mar 2015
#214
We have at least four separate issues going on. I will try to disentangle them.
DemocratSinceBirth
Mar 2015
#54
I find that to be an incredibly offensive characterization of victims of sexual assault.
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#73
So what happened to them....the forcible acts described in EAW, is not "real rape?" nt
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#81
A "mere sex crime" "real rape?" I find it interesting that you don't actually address the acts
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#96
Unbelievable. I must say, this thread has certainly been very enlightening.
NYC Liberal
Mar 2015
#108
glad someone alerted on that one. It was every bit as offensive. Thanks, Cha
Tuesday Afternoon
Mar 2015
#158
Yes--you seem to be claiming that Shamir is being "smeared." How does one smear a
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#133
How does one smear Assange on this point? Israel Shamir--and his son, work for Wikileaks.
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#144
How does one smear Assange on this point? Was he unable to work the Google?
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#169
You would think Assange would google a prospective employee, right? I mean, this is the guy
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#174
"Julian Assange Backs Ron and Rand Paul".. yeah, I'd say assange is something.. backing racist
Cha
Mar 2015
#194
Forget Your Team: Your Online Violence Toward Girls and Women Is What Can Kiss My Ass.. more
Cha
Mar 2015
#196
And that's what so many here are trying to avoid...the "smear" of Assange is nothing
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#199
"Assange and Shamir have been friends for years".. and Shamir is going for the testoserone defense.
Cha
Mar 2015
#201
I haven't found a single reason to impugn the credibility of the victims. If you have, please share
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#120
Extradition where, Manny? To the US? Then why didn't we extradite him from the UK when he was
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#149
Given that Ed Snowden was allowed to grab virtually everything from the NSA
MannyGoldstein
Mar 2015
#167
Assange was on bail for two years, living in the English countryside. Are you saying the
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#175
How does one smear a Holocaust-denying anti-Semite? I'm still waiting for you to
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#150
You post this fully knowing I already said I wasn't talking about smearing Shamir.
Hissyspit
Mar 2015
#168
"Bad associate decisions" is what we are calling hiring and keeping Israel Shamir and his son?
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#171
Do you think the women who have accused him of rape deserve their day in court? n/t
pnwmom
Mar 2015
#181
Assange shouldn't have credibility anyway. After he was essentially forced to reveal he lied about
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#246
Colbert (one of my few genuine heroes of this age) had Assange's number early on.
randome
Oct 2016
#255