Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Hill: Why Hillary Can Win Big [View all]Marr
(20,317 posts)37. Oh right, because Obama was just electoral candy.
A black man with not one, but two names that recalled our biggest national bogeymen of the day. Can't judge a hyper-connected, hyper-funded political insider too harshly for losing to someone with such an easy ticket.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Just VOTE....vote for anyone but a christofascist who wants World War 3. It is not brain surgery.
Fred Sanders
Mar 2015
#2
In an America that is seeing rapid demographic changes such candidacies will be seen as the norm./NT
DemocratSinceBirth
Mar 2015
#50
No living person who is eligible to run in 2016 has received more presidential primary votes
geek tragedy
Mar 2015
#10
Obama is not eligible to run in 2016. Will edit my post title to make that clear nt
geek tragedy
Mar 2015
#13
Here's what matters from '08 primaries: Both Clinton and Obama individually got more votes in the
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2015
#24
BS Her favorables are falling, unfavorables rising, peaked in 2011. "Conversation with America" WTF
NYC_SKP
Mar 2015
#17
"Conversation with America"? WTF? It's like a god damned Bathroom Tissue commercial.
NYC_SKP
Mar 2015
#21
Working folks are too busy, errrrr, working than gazing at their navels
DemocratSinceBirth
Mar 2015
#29
The proposition that because someone lost one battle he or she will lose every succeeding battle.
DemocratSinceBirth
Mar 2015
#18
Aren't you just a -little- ashamed to support someone who went to extraordinary lengths
RiverLover
Mar 2015
#23
Next to my mom and girlfriend I hold no woman in higher esteem than Hillary Clinton...
DemocratSinceBirth
Mar 2015
#25
About that 'lost one election so that means all will be lost' concept. In Liz Warren's Republican
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2015
#31
Do you really think the email non scandal is a reason not to support someone?
Thinkingabout
Mar 2015
#54
Clip: In which Hillary Clinton shares how she connects so well to everyday working folks:
NYC_SKP
Mar 2015
#28
Franklin Roosevelt created the Office Of Strategic Services which was the forerunner to the CIA.
DemocratSinceBirth
Mar 2015
#49
The author criticizes Bibi and Rudy and praises President Obama, according to your citation
DemocratSinceBirth
Mar 2015
#48
Stassen was a fringe candidate...Anybody was going to look unfavorable compared to John Kennedy./NT
DemocratSinceBirth
Mar 2015
#47
I want Bernie, but if he isnt the nominee I will vote for who HE votes for...
NoJusticeNoPeace
Mar 2015
#52