Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Scientists Confirm Institute of Medicine Recommendation for Vitamin D Intake Was Miscalculated [View all]Orrex
(67,108 posts)13. Again, what kind of answer do you think you were seeking?
And what do you propose as an alternative to the polluted "science" that you decry with scare-quotes?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Scientists Confirm Institute of Medicine Recommendation for Vitamin D Intake Was Miscalculated [View all]
LiberalArkie
Mar 2015
OP
Wow, and I was wondering if I was being overprescribed because the doc put me on 3000 IU a day.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Mar 2015
#1
Not just that. It affects the cardio vascular system, muscle health, etc. The ratio of calcium to
freshwest
Mar 2015
#22
I find it really helps mental function... My doc tested me years ago and mine was practically
peacebird
Mar 2015
#27
ok, wait a minute: didn't i just see something a few days ago about how vitamin D recs are
ND-Dem
Mar 2015
#3
somebody making a mistake in calculations for the RDAs isn't "enabling us to adapt as we
ND-Dem
Mar 2015
#6
maybe you just didn't read it and are trying to cover up your laziness. an error that isn't
ND-Dem
Mar 2015
#12
I'm not sure what you mean by traditional medicine, but naturopaths, for example,
pnwmom
Mar 2015
#23
But SCIENCE! Science! What? ooo, you mean dietary science can make mistakes?
HereSince1628
Mar 2015
#11
Vitamin D is a fat soluable vitamin & needs to be in a fat solution to be absorbed.
hue
Mar 2015
#24
You obviously don't live in the cloudy part of the Pacific Northwest. For months at a time, we can get very little sun.
pnwmom
Mar 2015
#40
My skin doctor, eye doctor, and internists have all told me that people living here need supplements
pnwmom
Mar 2015
#42
And then there was this doctor on CBS recently. He made the hosts very cross.
madfloridian
Mar 2015
#16
I didn't watch the interview, but many of the doctors who deny the value of D supplementation
pnwmom
Mar 2015
#26
Then go to the UC San Diego website. Even 4 years ago they were recommending 4000 units daily.
pnwmom
Mar 2015
#21
Science changes, that why it is science. Otherwise it would be called a religion.
LiberalArkie
Mar 2015
#31
There might be ways around that, even Einstien's theories possibly allowed that...
Humanist_Activist
Mar 2015
#52
I have been taking 5000 IU for some time. Before some decides to load up though they
still_one
Mar 2015
#29