Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Orrex

(67,108 posts)
13. Again, what kind of answer do you think you were seeking?
Sat Mar 21, 2015, 04:38 PM
Mar 2015

And what do you propose as an alternative to the polluted "science" that you decry with scare-quotes?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Wow, and I was wondering if I was being overprescribed because the doc put me on 3000 IU a day. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2015 #1
I take 4000 iu and can feel the difference. PeoViejo Mar 2015 #2
Feel a difference? Ruby the Liberal Mar 2015 #17
Try this out... I know several people who have been prescribed 3K a day: freshwest Mar 2015 #19
I get that it is good for bones and teeth Ruby the Liberal Mar 2015 #20
Not just that. It affects the cardio vascular system, muscle health, etc. The ratio of calcium to freshwest Mar 2015 #22
I find it really helps mental function... My doc tested me years ago and mine was practically peacebird Mar 2015 #27
Thanks! Ruby the Liberal Mar 2015 #51
I tried 6K a Day but went back to 4K PeoViejo Mar 2015 #53
ok, wait a minute: didn't i just see something a few days ago about how vitamin D recs are ND-Dem Mar 2015 #3
It says that science enables us to adapt as we obtain more information Orrex Mar 2015 #5
somebody making a mistake in calculations for the RDAs isn't "enabling us to adapt as we ND-Dem Mar 2015 #6
Then your question was flawed. Orrex Mar 2015 #8
maybe you just didn't read it and are trying to cover up your laziness. an error that isn't ND-Dem Mar 2015 #12
Again, what kind of answer do you think you were seeking? Orrex Mar 2015 #13
I'm not sure what you mean by traditional medicine, but naturopaths, for example, pnwmom Mar 2015 #23
Low Vitamin D Linked with Depression in Young Women PADemD Mar 2015 #10
"Too much vitamin D can be as unhealthy as too little, study suggests" nilram Mar 2015 #15
Don't worry about it moonbeam23 Mar 2015 #32
Not worried about it; responding to ND-Dem's post nilram Mar 2015 #50
This is good to know. ananda Mar 2015 #4
Wow! and thought this was going to be the other way around! hedgehog Mar 2015 #7
Wonderful vitamin think4yourself Mar 2015 #9
But SCIENCE! Science! What? ooo, you mean dietary science can make mistakes? HereSince1628 Mar 2015 #11
Hah! My doctors had recommended I take 4,000 units a day pnwmom Mar 2015 #14
Vitamin D is a fat soluable vitamin & needs to be in a fat solution to be absorbed. hue Mar 2015 #24
I do take it with fat-soluble foods. That's not the problem. pnwmom Mar 2015 #25
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2015 #39
You obviously don't live in the cloudy part of the Pacific Northwest. For months at a time, we can get very little sun. pnwmom Mar 2015 #40
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2015 #41
My skin doctor, eye doctor, and internists have all told me that people living here need supplements pnwmom Mar 2015 #42
Post removed Post removed Mar 2015 #43
So you don't trust physicians or Registered Dieticians with Masters Degrees. pnwmom Mar 2015 #46
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2015 #47
And then there was this doctor on CBS recently. He made the hosts very cross. madfloridian Mar 2015 #16
I didn't watch the interview, but many of the doctors who deny the value of D supplementation pnwmom Mar 2015 #26
Be careful about overdoing it. Kber Mar 2015 #18
Then go to the UC San Diego website. Even 4 years ago they were recommending 4000 units daily. pnwmom Mar 2015 #21
I cut back after things warm-up and can work outside. PeoViejo Mar 2015 #54
So the old Science was Woo? nt MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #28
Science changes, that why it is science. Otherwise it would be called a religion. LiberalArkie Mar 2015 #31
Pretty sure man will never be able to go faster than light. former9thward Mar 2015 #34
Poster kept using the past tense, maybe s/he is from the future? DRoseDARs Mar 2015 #36
Possibly. former9thward Mar 2015 #37
There might be ways around that, even Einstien's theories possibly allowed that... Humanist_Activist Mar 2015 #52
what a comment, Manny Duppers Mar 2015 #48
I have been taking 5000 IU for some time. Before some decides to load up though they still_one Mar 2015 #29
Is it good for you or bad for you this week? joanbarnes Mar 2015 #30
Got Milk? Spitfire of ATJ Mar 2015 #33
this is UC University research! Duppers Mar 2015 #49
does this actually surprise anyone? niyad Mar 2015 #35
I too was surprised...thought they would say people were wasting their time and money. SoapBox Mar 2015 #38
I asked my eye doctor if there was anything I should be taking for eye health pnwmom Mar 2015 #45
The USDA's recommendations haven't caught up to the lower value. Jim Lane Mar 2015 #44
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Scientists Confirm Instit...»Reply #13