Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
92. Oh dear.
Sun Mar 22, 2015, 03:15 PM
Mar 2015

Brooklynite, are you familiar with false compromise fallacies? it's the beleif that the middle point between two arguments must be the correct one. Also, are you familiar with the fact that people will lie to each other, and themselves, in a quest for social standing?

The "bulk of the voters are still in the political center" in the same way the bulk of Americans are middle class. They're not, but the social expectation is that "the middle is just right" and anything outside that middle point is 'fringe' and thus socially undesirable.

By the numbers, most Americans are actually poor and lower-income, a number that is increasing (yay centrism!) However, more often than not, even some guy living paycheck-to-paycheck and constantly owing his landlord half of the rent is going to claim to be "middle class." not because he actually is, but because that's the perceived societal norm. Admitting that he is in fact poor conjures all sorts of social stigma - he's on the fringe, an outsider, beyond "mainstream," practically an alien (and this is without touching on the calvinist financial perceptions of America, where poverty is a character failing rather than an economic problem)

Politics plays the same way. When presented policy-by-policy, more Americans favor liberalism. Even self-professed conservatives prefer liberalism (so long as you don't tell them what it is, because hey, reactionary conditioning.) So why the "moderation" fetishism? Same thing, the Goldilocks Principle of american society, where being in the middle is "just right." There's social pressure to cast oneself as "middle ground" because that is perceived as "normal," 'mainstream," etc.

Now. I want to hear two things from you.

ONE: What liberal positions are you willing to sacrifice or even strip entirely, in order to achieve "appeal to the center"?

TWO: Which particular liberal policies killed the elections of McGovern, Mondale, Dukakais and - oh, you forgot Kerry. What conservative policies brought victory to Carter, Clinton, Gore, and Obama?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

My 2c on the Hillary question [View all] ruffburr Mar 2015 OP
The Hillaryites are engaged in a false choice effort ... earthside Mar 2015 #1
I will support the Democratic nominee who ever it is and I say that as a Hillary supporter. William769 Mar 2015 #3
"A false choice effort" JaneyVee Mar 2015 #5
The poster pointed out false logic tactics. merrily Mar 2015 #12
I smell Rats...on this issue on DU. V0ltairesGh0st Mar 2015 #66
..... merrily Mar 2015 #10
That wasn't the point of the OP, it was to vote for whoever the Democratic nominee is still_one Mar 2015 #28
If you are not for the nominee... joshcryer Mar 2015 #79
I will support the nominee. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #2
First there are primaries. In primaries we FIGHT for what we want. NYC_SKP Mar 2015 #4
No one is willing to fight fadedrose Mar 2015 #6
What has them spooked is the position of the Democratic Party. merrily Mar 2015 #9
The media is cooperating? William769 Mar 2015 #11
I didn't say the media was supporting Hillary. merrily Mar 2015 #13
Your post could only be taken one way. William769 Mar 2015 #15
Maybe you are capable of reading it only one way, but it was capable of being read any number of merrily Mar 2015 #53
I miss prosense. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #17
Awww. Maybe this will help. merrily Mar 2015 #18
Well i liked her. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #20
Did all I could to help you out. merrily Mar 2015 #26
I rather think not. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #27
No, really, I did all I could. merrily Mar 2015 #33
I thought better of you. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #36
No, you didn't, but you are attacking me as a human being, which is merrily Mar 2015 #37
You would actually be surprised. i did. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #38
I know from experience how important having the last word is to you, so go ahead. merrily Mar 2015 #42
+1...nt SidDithers Mar 2015 #46
I like ProSense. sheshe2 Mar 2015 #30
Well said! hrmjustin Mar 2015 #31
Thank you, justin. sheshe2 Mar 2015 #39
She was one of a kind and had to endure a lot of venom by people on this board. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #41
Amen to that tularetom Mar 2015 #64
Thank you so much for saying that, tularetom. sheshe2 Mar 2015 #65
I am sorry her husband was ill. merrily Mar 2015 #34
Aaaah... sheshe2 Mar 2015 #50
I have been attacked personally--not just my posting style, but my honesty and other things I value merrily Mar 2015 #51
actually sheshe2 Mar 2015 #54
I followed one through about 20 of her posts and it did not support her point. merrily Mar 2015 #59
I love ProSense.. and I'm so sorry that her husband has been ill. She had many informative OPs and Cha Mar 2015 #56
Kicking what you said Cha! sheshe2 Mar 2015 #58
Mahalo she! Cha Mar 2015 #61
Perfect, Cha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! sheshe2 Mar 2015 #62
.. Cha Mar 2015 #63
The polls are very poorly designed, even when they're trying not to push-poll. NYC_SKP Mar 2015 #89
Maybe, this time, the primaries will be non existent or pro forma, at best, though. merrily Mar 2015 #8
Wow. If the Democratic Party wants to eliminate choice, they do it at their own peril. NYC_SKP Mar 2015 #90
Do they really do it at their own peril, though? merrily Mar 2015 #93
It might be more accurate to say "at our own peril". True, it took a ton of money for 3rd party. NYC_SKP Mar 2015 #94
Given what Schumer, Brown and Frank--all prominent and powerful people within the party-- merrily Mar 2015 #95
"A Real Democrat"! Yes, indeed. I am confident that Warren would win if allowed to run. NYC_SKP Mar 2015 #96
+1000 smirkymonkey Mar 2015 #88
Why should debate stop before a primary even starts? How undemocratic! merrily Mar 2015 #7
Absolutely. Everything is up for grabs until a nominee is choosen still_one Mar 2015 #32
Not according to the OP. merrily Mar 2015 #35
I will not vote for a Republican or a DINO Fearless Mar 2015 #14
I will certainly vote for any Democratic ticket Man from Pickens Mar 2015 #16
It must be exciting to be able to decide who IS and IS NOT a Democrat..... brooklynite Mar 2015 #19
Fear my awesome powers Man from Pickens Mar 2015 #23
Guess that lets Barack Obama out... brooklynite Mar 2015 #24
Take the loyalty oath, dammit! It was good enough for Joe McCarthy, it's good enough for New Dems. merrily Mar 2015 #44
No, he or she is deciding only whom he or she considers a Democrat. Surely, he or she has the power merrily Mar 2015 #29
I never cared for puma in 2008 and don't care for it now. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #21
I know, huh.. whoa.. those guys. :( Cha Mar 2015 #57
.... 840high Mar 2015 #22
As i said, I will vote for the candidate on the ballot who closest fits my ideals as a progressive Scootaloo Mar 2015 #25
On the assumption that you're not in a solid red or blue State... brooklynite Mar 2015 #40
Terrorism and the SCOTUS. I would think Democrats would be embarrassed to resort to either of merrily Mar 2015 #43
So you're saying the Democrat won't be sufficiently progressive? Scootaloo Mar 2015 #45
I'm saying I'll vote for whomever the Democrat is, whether he/she was my Primary candidate or not... brooklynite Mar 2015 #48
So to recap... Scootaloo Mar 2015 #52
I have no objection to a Liberal winning... brooklynite Mar 2015 #55
No, I think you need to do the explaining Scootaloo Mar 2015 #60
If you wish... brooklynite Mar 2015 #86
Oh dear. Scootaloo Mar 2015 #92
here is why it matters DonCoquixote Mar 2015 #47
thank you for pointing out that economic rights are women's rights too. liberal_at_heart Mar 2015 #49
No matter who is running for the Democratic Presidency, you all have to vote akbacchus_BC Mar 2015 #67
If there is a socialist Democrat or even just a left of center liberal Democrat I will vote for them liberal_at_heart Mar 2015 #68
I understand! Then here we go again with the lesser of two evils! akbacchus_BC Mar 2015 #71
I will not vote for a Democrat that does not fight for economic equality, period. liberal_at_heart Mar 2015 #72
A vote that is not for a Democrat is a vote for the republican. akbacchus_BC Mar 2015 #76
I don't care if you think a vote not for a Democrat is a vote for a Republican. liberal_at_heart Mar 2015 #77
I care, because it's shitty reasoning. No one's vote is "owed" to any party or candidate. winter is coming Mar 2015 #97
You want to know why my 20 year old daughter is not interested in politics? Because she is trying to liberal_at_heart Mar 2015 #70
I understand what you are saying. But under a republican regime, those costs will go up. akbacchus_BC Mar 2015 #73
Sorry, I disagree. Like I said, if there is a Socialist Democrat or a left of center liberal liberal_at_heart Mar 2015 #75
This is not a smart answer to you! A Democratic President akbacchus_BC Mar 2015 #78
I have lived here in the US all my life, all 39 years and have seen Republican and Democratic liberal_at_heart Mar 2015 #80
I am not trying to convince you. You have to do what you need to do in your akbacchus_BC Mar 2015 #82
Let's see, eliminate political choice then demand everyone vote for one candidate - sounds like whereisjustice Mar 2015 #69
yeah, a Republican victory would bring war, free-trade agreements, dismemberment of labor, MisterP Mar 2015 #74
I plan on voting for hillary but gwheezie Mar 2015 #81
it's 2015. are we gonna be doing this til 2016?!?!? I VOTED FOR KERRY, DUKAKIS, it is ALL ABOUT pansypoo53219 Mar 2015 #83
FYI, some of the "Republican crooks" are self-identifying as Democrats. To wit ... Scuba Mar 2015 #84
Wow, GOTV already. Savannahmann Mar 2015 #85
This has been posted ad nausem cali Mar 2015 #87
No. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2015 #91
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»My 2c on the Hillary ques...»Reply #92