Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

whereisjustice

(2,941 posts)
22. I would say the rich white male has all those resources at his disposal. Everyone else? Not so much.
Sun Mar 22, 2015, 10:09 PM
Mar 2015

As proven by the outrageous number of convictions of non-rich, non-white citizens.

Even the UN has taken notice.


The United Nations on Friday denounced the U.S. for reportedly violating an international treaty against torture, including several instances of police shootings of unarmed black youth. In a 16-page review of the U.S.’ track record on torture since 2006, the U.N. took aim at what it said were “numerous reports” of police brutality against minorities as well as distressing conditions in some U.S. prisons, according to Reuters. The document, which does not mention the recent events in Ferguson, Missouri, specifically, came in the wake of a grand jury’s decision not to indict a Ferguson police officer in the August shooting of unarmed black teenager Michael Brown.

The U.N. Committee against Torture cited several examples of "excessive use of force by law enforcement officials, in particular against persons belonging to certain racial and ethnic group.” The report, the U.N.’s first on the U.S. since 2006, condemned the extensive use of Tasers against people resisting arrest, citing two recent cases in Florida and Chicago that turned deadly.

http://www.ibtimes.com/ferguson-shooting-un-torture-committee-condemns-us-excessive-force-law-enforcement-1730614

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

"...a fawning groupie..." Sounds like a lot of DUers, unfortunately. randome Mar 2015 #1
Oh there are a lot of fawning groupies on DU.. Fumesucker Mar 2015 #5
Da fuq? OilemFirchen Mar 2015 #7
Evidently I lack the fawning groupie gene Fumesucker Mar 2015 #10
I must say it has effected my opinion about the Guardian. Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #2
"Guardian tradition provides for a direct vote by the staff for a new editor — a vote MADem Mar 2015 #3
Questioning Snowden's retreat to Russia and his protection by Vladimir Putin was internally verboten Cha Mar 2015 #4
Yeah.....no shit. nt msanthrope Mar 2015 #6
St Snowden the Martyr on Russia.. USA-BAD/Russia-Good.. Bullshite Cha Mar 2015 #11
Yep. joshcryer Mar 2015 #9
I laugh at the GAS bunch that targets those who don't agree with them. Cha Mar 2015 #12
Does this mean we get the old Guardian back? OilemFirchen Mar 2015 #8
Very enlightening... Spazito Mar 2015 #13
Bottom line: I'm glad the Guardian published what it did. Jim Lane Mar 2015 #14
security concern trolls are so angry that Snowden violated a major rule... whereisjustice Mar 2015 #15
''Nothing says 'representative Democracy' like dragnet citizen surveillance.'' Octafish Mar 2015 #16
Police state, right treestar Mar 2015 #19
Rich white males would agree with you. For everyone else... whereisjustice Mar 2015 #20
In a police state, you have no right to trial by jury treestar Mar 2015 #21
I would say the rich white male has all those resources at his disposal. Everyone else? Not so much. whereisjustice Mar 2015 #22
Baloney the law applies treestar Mar 2015 #23
the law applies only if it is accessible to everyone - the raw data says it isn't. Do you suggest whereisjustice Mar 2015 #24
Oh, the USA Today doesn't like The Guardian hootinholler Mar 2015 #17
Sunday kick Blue_Tires Mar 2015 #18
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Wolff: Snowden effect hit...»Reply #22