Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: CODE RED – Computerized Election Theft and the New American Century [View all]Andy823
(11,555 posts)25. K&R nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
123 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
CODE RED – Computerized Election Theft and the New American Century [View all]
Time for change
Mar 2015
OP
Electronic voting is not secure...look at ANY year's computer hacking headlines for the evidence.
Fred Sanders
Mar 2015
#3
Lucas county partial results above make the switch from Kerry to Green candidate Cobb obvious.
hedda_foil
Mar 2015
#106
What still haunts me is the fact that the voting machine vendor reprogrammed all the machines
hedda_foil
Mar 2015
#123
Except that bradblog.com has been covering electronic vote theft. Electronic, the NEW way
valerief
Mar 2015
#16
The issue of electronic vote manipulation has been made into a pariah by our corporate news media
Time for change
Mar 2015
#18
There were lots of problems with poorly sealed bags. We've changed bags since then because of that.
PeaceNikki
Mar 2015
#75
I was there and read it 4 years ago. The melodrama and silly rumors were bad enough in real time.
PeaceNikki
Mar 2015
#78
If there were evidence of fraud, Kloppenburg and our team would have found it
PeaceNikki
Mar 2015
#91
Perhaps so...point to where she says those security failures were utilized.
brooklynite
Mar 2015
#54
I'm not arguing that there aren't potential issues, I'm arguing no evidence of intentional fraud
brooklynite
Mar 2015
#102
Thank you. I've been talking about this since 2004/5 when the Ohio data came out.
CaptainTruth
Mar 2015
#27
What are you doing in your State to improve the voting systems? Anything? Nothing?
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2015
#28
until we return to verifiable voting via hand counted paper ballots, we have no democracy and no
Kip Humphrey
Mar 2015
#33
Okay...you've got your hand-counted paper ballots. How do you aggregate the votes?
brooklynite
Mar 2015
#56
Same old BS, you have no idea of the election system in the US. There are over 50,000 voting
CK_John
Mar 2015
#38
Why do scanners and machines have proprietery code we citizens aren't allowed to inspect?
Omaha Steve
Mar 2015
#42
That's why many tactics are utilized, silly human. When the known issues are not tackled, and
mother earth
Mar 2015
#43
What if there are many individual voting precincts that have veribiable voting?
Time for change
Mar 2015
#72
Check it out ~ we even had an Electronic Voting Links Library here at DU years ago:
Zorra
Mar 2015
#49
The DU right wing will do its best to convince you that vote manipulation..."
brooklynite
Mar 2015
#65
Great to see you posting again. This is probably the most important issue before us today.
rhett o rick
Mar 2015
#80
I don't have the statistics but I believe that exit polling has been very accurate in
rhett o rick
Mar 2015
#101
2006 we took back the House....and pick up 5 Governorships and 6 senate seats
brooklynite
Mar 2015
#98
If Dems show up in numbers, there's no way they can win. They're not showing up.
YOHABLO
Mar 2015
#95
14th Characteristic of Fascism (http://www.rense.com/general37/char.htm):
blkmusclmachine
Mar 2015
#110
Watch for Republicans gaining and passing from behind when the later returns come in.
GoneFishin
Mar 2015
#114
Okay...for the sake of discussion, let's stipulate that there's digital tampering of elections...
brooklynite
Mar 2015
#118