Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: In Iowa, O’Malley sounds a lot like a Democrat liberals love: Warren [View all]Raine1967
(11,676 posts)15. This was posters at Vox today:
http://www.vox.com/2015/3/23/8272423/martin-omally-glass-steagall
The O'Malley plan for finance
In a March 20 op-ed for the Des Moines Register, O'Malley outlined an aggressive plan for financial reform that would go well beyond the provisions of the existing Dodd-Frank legislation.
His agenda:
--Reinstate Glass-Steagall and break up the largest and most diverse banks.
--Prevent banks for taking tax writeoffs when they pay fines.
--Insist on CEO resignations as part of the resolution of regulatory misconduct claims and seek to prosecute individual executives for misconduct.
--An equivalent of the three strikes and you're out policy to "revoke a bank's right to operate if they repeatedly break the law."
These ideas would, if implemented, radically alter the role of finance in American society. Large financial institutions would have to act in an extremely risk-averse (and not-so-lucrative) manner and likely become substantially smaller besides. The Obama administration and mostly likely Clinton would argue that this is unnecessary for financial stability and risky for the economy as a whole.
But to populists, that's precisely the point. These ideas would move beyond a narrow focus on the stability of the financial system to a broader attack on finance's role as one of the commanding heights of the American economy.
In a March 20 op-ed for the Des Moines Register, O'Malley outlined an aggressive plan for financial reform that would go well beyond the provisions of the existing Dodd-Frank legislation.
His agenda:
--Reinstate Glass-Steagall and break up the largest and most diverse banks.
--Prevent banks for taking tax writeoffs when they pay fines.
--Insist on CEO resignations as part of the resolution of regulatory misconduct claims and seek to prosecute individual executives for misconduct.
--An equivalent of the three strikes and you're out policy to "revoke a bank's right to operate if they repeatedly break the law."
These ideas would, if implemented, radically alter the role of finance in American society. Large financial institutions would have to act in an extremely risk-averse (and not-so-lucrative) manner and likely become substantially smaller besides. The Obama administration and mostly likely Clinton would argue that this is unnecessary for financial stability and risky for the economy as a whole.
But to populists, that's precisely the point. These ideas would move beyond a narrow focus on the stability of the financial system to a broader attack on finance's role as one of the commanding heights of the American economy.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
85 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I don't think so. I think he sees that there is a worry about HRC in a certain group of our party
FSogol
Mar 2015
#2
Doesn't look like it - I doubt Hillary wants a running mate who is very liberal at all.
djean111
Mar 2015
#3
And even if she wanted a liberal, her financiers would veto such a VP, so not gonna happen.
closeupready
Mar 2015
#77
Thank you. This is the first that I have heard about where he stands and I like it.
jwirr
Mar 2015
#8
Alot of Democrats agreed with him because they voted to approve casinos in the 2012 elections.
DCBob
Mar 2015
#14
Doesn't bother me whatsoever. I like a flutter every now and then. So what.
closeupready
Mar 2015
#81
BS. He was mayor of Baltimore and Governor of Maryland. There are tons of info on his record
FSogol
Mar 2015
#27
I look forward to reading your posts where you promote Democrats running for office
FSogol
Mar 2015
#46
Bingo. I think you hit MOM's weak spot. How many will believe his nice sounding words?
Peregrine Took
Mar 2015
#28
good thing for our country that those with the ignorant cheap pot shots have no clue about the
Cha
Mar 2015
#55
O'Malley's been an elected official for 25 years, from city council to governor
Orangepeel
Mar 2015
#61
Sounds like he's a Perfect VP Candidate for Hillary given his beliefs/connections...
KoKo
Mar 2015
#84
What a bad headline - sure, he sounds "a lot like warren", but he sounds JUST like O'Malley!!!!
George II
Mar 2015
#47
Right now that's his stance. He needs to get with the opinion of the majority of
B Calm
Mar 2015
#72
Not sure I agree that it is the "opinion of the majority of people in our country", but
FSogol
Mar 2015
#73