General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So it turns out that nadinbrzezinski was correct re Fukushima [View all]FBaggins
(26,735 posts)You're seriously going to claim that people that you have on ignore are conspiring to get a reply that you're forced to see?
You do know that when you put someone on ignore... it doesn't impact the rest of the DUers, right? Everyone else would be able to see it and let you know (and... frankly... such behavior would be worthy of an alert and hide IMO). Heck... I'd imagine that someone who was stalking you would prefer to post ridicule in replies that you couldn't see (and thus couldn't refute) so that everyone else would see it.
I did NOT say that a nuclear reactor is the same as a nuclear bomb. How ridiculous!
You should read your post again. There's no question that your second and third paragraph drew a connection between support for nuclear power - and the impact of those bomb tests. IOW - The reply was perfectly reasonable.
I did not say that anyone posting a response to me is a verbal bully (although if the shoe fits...).
That could be true... I'm not stalking your posts and wouldn't know. But the thread is full of such claims when refering to people who really were just providing Nadin with facts. Yes, it often got heated, but every case that I can remember was something that she started.