Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I have met Obama, [View all]Omaha Steve
(108,811 posts)55. 23 SENATORS SEND LETTER TO PRESIDENT ASKING THAT TPP “KEEP FAITH WITH AMERICAN WORKERS”
Notice there are no R's on the list.
http://www.cwa-union.org/news/entry/23_senators_send_letter_to_president_asking_that_tpp_keep_faith_with_americ#.VRDRaPnF-So
Lawmakers Outline Concerns About Proposed Deals Impact On Workers, Environment, And Consumers
Dec 4, 2012
WASHINGTON, DC The Communications Workers of America (CWA) today praised the 23 Senators who sent a letter to President Barack Obama outlining their concerns with the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade treaty, urging the President to include in any agreement, specific provisions that protect American jobs.(*)
The TPP has been called NAFTA on steroids, and is set to be the largest trade deal ever brokered, yet the negotiations have been held in secret, without public or Congressional input. While the public has been locked out of these discussions, more than 600 major corporations have had access to all stages of the process and are actively lobbying for their interests.(*)
The Senators see the TPP as an opportunity to stop offshoring and create jobs here in America by protecting Buy American programs, ensure participating countries are adhering to established labor standards and allowing workers to organize and collectively bargain.(*)
The full text of the letter is below and may be viewed here:
http://cwafiles.org/national/News/12-3-12%20Senate%20letter%20to%20President%20re%20TPP.pdf(*)
Dear Mr. President:
As the economy continues to recover, a major priority of the American people and of your Administration has been preventing the outsourcing of good American jobs. In the context of trade policy, we believe, like you, that trade when done right should create and preserve good American jobs instead of outsourcing them. As your Administration has stated, a balanced trade agenda means opening markets for U.S. exporters and keeping faith with workers here at home.(*)
Pursuing such a balanced trade agenda requires that your Administration and Congress work together. Nowhere is such cooperation on trade more urgent than in the ongoing negotiations on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), a vast, multi-country free trade agreement that will have a significant effect on global trade and investment. It should be crafted to maximize good job creation and market expansion while minimizing the incentives for further off-shoring of middle class jobs.(*)
With that objective in mind, as you and your United States Trade Representative continue negotiations on a TPP, we respectfully urge you to
Maintain Buy American government procurement requirements. The American people, through their elected officials, should not be prohibited from establishing government procurement policies that prioritize job creation in the United States. We hope that you will direct USTR negotiators to ensure that any TPP not restrict Buy American and Buy Local government procurement policies at the federal or sub-federal level.
Require strong Rules of Origin. The Rules of Origin in the TPP should ensure that only signatories to the TPP will benefit from its increased market access and other provisions so that employment opportunities in the U.S. may be expanded. Non-TPP members must not be allowed to use weak rules of origin as a backdoor way to enter the U.S. market and further depress U.S. job prospects.
Ensure that State-Owned and State-Supported Commercial Enterprises (SOEs) operate on a level playing field. Given that SOEs are more common in the other TPP countries than in the U.S., the TPP should require that SOEs competing with private U.S. enterprises operate and make decisions on a commercial basis. The agreement should also incorporate a reporting requirement so that countries have to provide information on the operation of their SOEs in other TPP countries on a regular basis.
Safeguard against investment and service sector rules that provide incentives for the off-shoring of both good manufacturing and service sector jobs. These rules should not grant corporations extreme protections that help them relocate investment and jobs overseas.
Include an enforceable obligation to protect fundamental labor rights. A country that denies these rights to workers is providing a hidden subsidy that keeps wages artificially lower than they otherwise would be if workers were free to organize and bargaina subsidy that makes U.S.-based producers less cost-competitive. The free exercise of fundamental labor rights is key to improving the standards of living and expanding export markets while labor suppression merely ensures that middle classesand export marketswill be smaller than they otherwise would be.
Safeguard against currency manipulation. To prevent the artificial suppression of job-creating American experts, the TPP should explicitly allow countries to respond to and offset currency manipulation.
If your Administration pursues these basic negotiating objectives and collaborates with Congress during the negotiationsahead of the ratification debatewe are confident that the TPP can become a tool for job creation that helps rebuild a national consensus on international trade policy. We look forward to working with you and the USTR to ensure that the TPP meets the crucial goals of opening markets to American exports and keeping faith with American workers. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact any of us. (*)
Sincerely, (*)
Senator Al Franken(*)
Senator Olympia J. Snowe(*)
Senator Sherrod Brown(*)
Senator Tom Harkin(*)
Senator Barbara Boxer(*)
Senator Ron Wyden(*)
Senator Kirsten Gillibrand(*)
Senator Sheldon Whitehouse(*)
Senator Jeff Merkley(*)
Senator Richard Blumenthal(*)
Senator Robert P. Casey Jr. (*)
Senator Joe Manchin III(*)
Senator Barbara A. Mikulski(*)
Senator Tom Udall(*)
Senator Jon Tester(*)
Senator Stabenow(*)
Senator Patrick J. Leahy(*)
Senator Bernard Sanders(*)
Senator Amy Klobuchar(*)
Senator John D. Rockefeller IV(*)
Senator Christopher A. Coons(*)
Senator Frank R. Lautenberg(*)
Senator Bill Nelson(*)
###
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
123 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
THATS WHAT I AM TALKIN ABOUT! I have seen 11'th dimension Chess player before. TTP?
Vincardog
Mar 2015
#2
So you agree the TTP is a vile instrument of destruction of America's Sovereignty and agree
Vincardog
Mar 2015
#9
That's a good idea, wait until it's "finalized" and ready to sign before you read it.
ND-Dem
Mar 2015
#13
23 SENATORS SEND LETTER TO PRESIDENT ASKING THAT TPP “KEEP FAITH WITH AMERICAN WORKERS”
Omaha Steve
Mar 2015
#55
So your repetitious talk of his concern over his "legacy" doesn't mean that? What exactly is
ND-Dem
Mar 2015
#70
You keep asking why he'd want to destroy his legacy. That suggests you think he's
ND-Dem
Mar 2015
#74
Well, you just keep waiting. I'm sure we'll all eat well on Obama's "legacy," regardless
ND-Dem
Mar 2015
#69
They aren't. They've already concluded his motives to be 100% pure, and are now
whathehell
Mar 2015
#107
How disingenuous of you not to believe me unless I can provide "a link to the finalized version of
Vincardog
Mar 2015
#38
Keep in mind that such leaks are often trial balloons, so it is essential to pop them fast when they
tblue37
Mar 2015
#73
Maybe Obama should invite EVERYONE to the White House and hold a jamboree
Major Hogwash
Mar 2015
#34
"So, in your opinion, is it reasonable, or unreasonable, to form a strong opinion..."
MannyGoldstein
Mar 2015
#104
So what you're saying is that you looked in his eyes and knew he was doing great?
Fearless
Mar 2015
#3
I still SEETHE at the mess that one Debbie whatawaste Schultz hath created.
ChairmanAgnostic
Mar 2015
#23
Now that he can't actually DO anything, he's can claim to want all sorts of things, yes.
Marr
Mar 2015
#91
I would substitute "doing okay" for "doing great," but otherwise I mostly agree with you.
nomorenomore08
Mar 2015
#105