Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: I have met Obama, [View all]

Omaha Steve

(108,811 posts)
55. 23 SENATORS SEND LETTER TO PRESIDENT ASKING THAT TPP “KEEP FAITH WITH AMERICAN WORKERS”
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 10:03 PM
Mar 2015


Notice there are no R's on the list.

http://www.cwa-union.org/news/entry/23_senators_send_letter_to_president_asking_that_tpp_keep_faith_with_americ#.VRDRaPnF-So

Lawmakers Outline Concerns About Proposed Deal’s Impact On Workers, Environment, And Consumers

Dec 4, 2012

WASHINGTON, DC – The Communications Workers of America (CWA) today praised the 23 Senators who sent a letter to President Barack Obama outlining their concerns with the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade treaty, urging the President to include in any agreement, specific provisions that protect American jobs.(*)

The TPP has been called “NAFTA on steroids,” and is set to be the largest trade deal ever brokered, yet the negotiations have been held in secret, without public or Congressional input. While the public has been locked out of these discussions, more than 600 major corporations have had access to all stages of the process and are actively lobbying for their interests.(*)

The Senators see the TPP as an opportunity to stop offshoring and create jobs here in America by protecting “Buy American” programs, ensure participating countries are adhering to established labor standards and allowing workers to organize and collectively bargain.(*)

The full text of the letter is below and may be viewed here:

http://cwafiles.org/national/News/12-3-12%20Senate%20letter%20to%20President%20re%20TPP.pdf(*)

“Dear Mr. President:

As the economy continues to recover, a major priority of the American people and of your Administration has been preventing the outsourcing of good American jobs. In the context of trade policy, we believe, like you, that trade when done right should create and preserve good American jobs instead of outsourcing them. As your Administration has stated, a balanced trade agenda means opening markets for U.S. exporters and keeping faith with workers here at home.(*)

Pursuing such a balanced trade agenda requires that your Administration and Congress work together. Nowhere is such cooperation on trade more urgent than in the ongoing negotiations on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), a vast, multi-country free trade agreement that will have a significant effect on global trade and investment. It should be crafted to maximize good job creation and market expansion while minimizing the incentives for further off-shoring of middle class jobs.(*)

With that objective in mind, as you and your United States Trade Representative continue negotiations on a TPP, we respectfully urge you to *)

Maintain “Buy American” government procurement requirements. The American people, through their elected officials, should not be prohibited from establishing government procurement policies that prioritize job creation in the United States. We hope that you will direct USTR negotiators to ensure that any TPP not restrict “Buy American” and “Buy Local” government procurement policies at the federal or sub-federal level.

Require strong Rules of Origin. The Rules of Origin in the TPP should ensure that only signatories to the TPP will benefit from its increased market access and other provisions so that employment opportunities in the U.S. may be expanded. Non-TPP members must not be allowed to use weak rules of origin as a backdoor way to enter the U.S. market and further depress U.S. job prospects.
Ensure that State-Owned and State-Supported Commercial Enterprises (SOEs) operate on a level playing field. Given that SOEs are more common in the other TPP countries than in the U.S., the TPP should require that SOEs competing with private U.S. enterprises operate and make decisions on a commercial basis. The agreement should also incorporate a reporting requirement so that countries have to provide information on the operation of their SOEs in other TPP countries on a regular basis.

Safeguard against investment and service sector rules that provide incentives for the off-shoring of both good manufacturing and service sector jobs. These rules should not grant corporations extreme protections that help them relocate investment and jobs overseas.

Include an enforceable obligation to protect fundamental labor rights. A country that denies these rights to workers is providing a hidden subsidy that keeps wages artificially lower than they otherwise would be if workers were free to organize and bargain—a subsidy that makes U.S.-based producers less cost-competitive. The free exercise of fundamental labor rights is key to improving the standards of living and expanding export markets while labor suppression merely ensures that middle classes—and export markets—will be smaller than they otherwise would be.

Safeguard against currency manipulation. To prevent the artificial suppression of job-creating American experts, the TPP should explicitly allow countries to respond to and offset currency manipulation.

If your Administration pursues these basic negotiating objectives and collaborates with Congress during the negotiations—ahead of the ratification debate—we are confident that the TPP can become a tool for job creation that helps rebuild a national consensus on international trade policy. We look forward to working with you and the USTR to ensure that the TPP meets the crucial goals of opening markets to American exports and keeping faith with American workers. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact any of us.” (*)

Sincerely, (*)

Senator Al Franken(*)

Senator Olympia J. Snowe(*)

Senator Sherrod Brown(*)

Senator Tom Harkin(*)

Senator Barbara Boxer(*)

Senator Ron Wyden(*)

Senator Kirsten Gillibrand(*)

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse(*)

Senator Jeff Merkley(*)

Senator Richard Blumenthal(*)

Senator Robert P. Casey Jr. (*)

Senator Joe Manchin III(*)

Senator Barbara A. Mikulski(*)

Senator Tom Udall(*)

Senator Jon Tester(*)

Senator Stabenow(*)

Senator Patrick J. Leahy(*)

Senator Bernard Sanders(*)

Senator Amy Klobuchar(*)

Senator John D. Rockefeller IV(*)

Senator Christopher A. Coons(*)

Senator Frank R. Lautenberg(*)

Senator Bill Nelson(*)

###

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I have met Obama, [View all] ChairmanAgnostic Mar 2015 OP
One acronym: TPP. Jackpine Radical Mar 2015 #1
THATS WHAT I AM TALKIN ABOUT! I have seen 11'th dimension Chess player before. TTP? Vincardog Mar 2015 #2
Yes, of course. NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #8
So you agree the TTP is a vile instrument of destruction of America's Sovereignty and agree Vincardog Mar 2015 #9
Well, unlike you ... NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #10
That's a good idea, wait until it's "finalized" and ready to sign before you read it. ND-Dem Mar 2015 #13
Until it IS finalized ... NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #14
TPP is catnip for most DUers. yallerdawg Mar 2015 #19
and once it *is* finalized, it's too damn late to do anything about it. obama's ND-Dem Mar 2015 #20
We can cook popcorn. Major Hogwash Mar 2015 #33
You got that right. 840high Mar 2015 #54
Okey-dokey, ND-Dem. NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #59
No, until we READ it and actually know what is in it. whathehell Mar 2015 #98
US Senators are not allowed to see it in it's current form Omaha Steve Mar 2015 #24
Any opinion to offer ... NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #25
Like when he didn't prosecute Wall St? Omaha Steve Mar 2015 #28
Sorry, OS ... NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #36
What changing the subject? Omaha Steve Mar 2015 #41
The topic being discussed ... NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #46
Simple answer: His Wall St buddies Omaha Steve Mar 2015 #47
Ya know ... NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #50
I gave you a choice of answers Omaha Steve Mar 2015 #52
"What is so great about this deal for the US ..." NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #53
23 SENATORS SEND LETTER TO PRESIDENT ASKING THAT TPP “KEEP FAITH WITH AMERICAN WORKERS” Omaha Steve Mar 2015 #55
You still haven't explained ... NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #57
I said he might be getting sold a bill of its goods from friends he trusts Omaha Steve Mar 2015 #58
Anyone who thinks ... NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #60
But they are in complete agreement on TPP Omaha Steve Mar 2015 #61
Well, that's probably because ... NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #62
Because he is dead wrong and doesn't get that!!! Omaha Steve Mar 2015 #63
So he's about to destroy his own legacy ... NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #64
I'm up from my nap Omaha Steve Mar 2015 #93
"Can you find a single R raising a red flag like the D's are doing?" ND-Dem Mar 2015 #67
Where did I say ... NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #68
So your repetitious talk of his concern over his "legacy" doesn't mean that? What exactly is ND-Dem Mar 2015 #70
Obama's legacy ... NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #71
You keep asking why he'd want to destroy his legacy. That suggests you think he's ND-Dem Mar 2015 #74
Oh, fer fuck's sake ... NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #75
that's all you can do, because your position is illogical. ND-Dem Mar 2015 #84
Yeah, that must be the source of my frustration. NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #86
here, let me copy it again, maybe you'll get it. ND-Dem Mar 2015 #87
Perhaps the word "concern" is the problem. NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #90
Traitors, or idiots? MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #77
IF you think TPP is great Omaha Steve Mar 2015 #88
I hate the TPP MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #89
Well, you just keep waiting. I'm sure we'll all eat well on Obama's "legacy," regardless ND-Dem Mar 2015 #69
Oh, puke. This obtuse act is ridiculous. Marr Mar 2015 #95
Names, addresses and secret emails! NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #96
His motive is irrelevant whathehell Mar 2015 #99
If his "fans" are "unquestioning" ... NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #102
They aren't. They've already concluded his motives to be 100% pure, and are now whathehell Mar 2015 #107
Uh, nice try ... NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #108
LOL..Sorry, but when your only argument in favor of the deal whathehell Mar 2015 #123
.... 840high Mar 2015 #56
Can you tell us what that motivation is? ASK PBO. Vincardog Mar 2015 #29
Uh, no ... NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #35
How disingenuous of you not to believe me unless I can provide "a link to the finalized version of Vincardog Mar 2015 #38
How disingenious of you ... NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #51
One strong hint is buried in the fine print of the closely guarded draft Omaha Steve Mar 2015 #39
I'm not talking about any final version ... NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #42
You trust the POTUS Omaha Steve Mar 2015 #44
In case you haven't noticed ... NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #48
Reply # 47 Omaha Steve Mar 2015 #49
Keep in mind that such leaks are often trial balloons, so it is essential to pop them fast when they tblue37 Mar 2015 #73
no, no, just trust our dreamy prez and wait for the final draft. say some. ND-Dem Mar 2015 #85
Maybe Obama should invite EVERYONE to the White House and hold a jamboree Major Hogwash Mar 2015 #34
So is Elizabeth Warren naive, or treacherous? MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #76
Why do you ask? NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #78
Because she thinks the TPP is a disaster. MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #79
The fact that you think ... NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #80
Sorry, I misunderstood you! MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #81
I said that exactly where? n/t NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #82
??? MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #83
Yes, you seem to be. NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #92
Of course not. MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #94
Still awaiting your answer MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #100
So far ... NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #103
"So, in your opinion, is it reasonable, or unreasonable, to form a strong opinion..." MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #104
In my opinion? NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #106
What was Bill Clinton's motivation for NAFTA? Same. TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #112
You are fantastic on social issues!!!!! stillwaiting Mar 2015 #101
+1,000 Nance Hekate Mar 2015 #17
Et tu, hekate? NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #22
I know, right? mcar Mar 2015 #26
I feel like such an idiot! NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #30
That's because your hand is on my knee!!! Major Hogwash Mar 2015 #31
I thought we'd agreed years ago ... NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #37
It's like an old Carol Burnett skit . . . Major Hogwash Mar 2015 #43
Long con mcar Mar 2015 #40
+1 Jamaal510 Mar 2015 #45
TPP isn't secret anymore thanks to wiki-leaks Omaha Steve Mar 2015 #109
"Leaks" are "leaks" ... NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #110
The FULL TPP text Omaha Steve Mar 2015 #111
Still a "draft", isn't it? NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #113
You work in this field and don't get it???? Omaha Steve Mar 2015 #114
These types of treaties are always done behind closed doors. NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #115
Your not answering the BIG question Omaha Steve Mar 2015 #116
My coworkers don't hold themselves out ... NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #117
STILL can't answer WHY it has to stay secret for FOUR years can you Omaha Steve Mar 2015 #118
You're quoting from what? NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #119
A "draft" that may have been discarded years ago? Omaha Steve Mar 2015 #120
Anyone can put any date as a header on any document. NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #121
Head in the sand Omaha Steve Mar 2015 #122
So what you're saying is that you looked in his eyes and knew he was doing great? Fearless Mar 2015 #3
Hey, I saw Kenya from his eyes. ChairmanAgnostic Mar 2015 #4
I agree that taking a firm stand is preferable to compromising away our goals. Fearless Mar 2015 #5
Two thinks. ChairmanAgnostic Mar 2015 #12
Of course, that is EXACTLY what the OP said! NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #15
It was a joke, my dear. Fearless Mar 2015 #65
If it was a joke ... NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #66
No harm done. Fearless Mar 2015 #72
He is who we picked treestar Mar 2015 #6
Aye, matey. ChairmanAgnostic Mar 2015 #7
We did extremely well ... NanceGreggs Mar 2015 #11
I have as well. Raine1967 Mar 2015 #16
KnR Hekate Mar 2015 #18
Your "4." is what improved the version to 2.0 fadedrose Mar 2015 #21
I still SEETHE at the mess that one Debbie whatawaste Schultz hath created. ChairmanAgnostic Mar 2015 #23
Dean did very well. He should still be there fadedrose Mar 2015 #27
This ^ ^ ^ Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2015 #32
Now that he can't actually DO anything, he's can claim to want all sorts of things, yes. Marr Mar 2015 #91
President Obama oldlib2 Mar 2015 #97
I would substitute "doing okay" for "doing great," but otherwise I mostly agree with you. nomorenomore08 Mar 2015 #105
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I have met Obama,»Reply #55