Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Clever girls, stupid boys? [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)76. In some countries men get leave and the kid is with a parent for up to YEAR....
It's taking off in more countries as well.
http://www.theguardian.com/money/2011/jul/19/norway-dads-peternity-leave-chemin
Norway, the fatherland
Paternity leave law helps to create more equal households
In France, Audun Lysbakken would probably pass for a rather offhand politician. Last autumn after the birth of his daughter, the Norwegian minister of childhood, equality and social cohesion took four months' paternity leave. Lysbakken changed nappies, did the shopping and cooked for 16 weeks while his wife went back to work. "I wanted to spend time with my baby and show that important though work is, it does not justify shying away from family responsibilities," he said. "Being at home means taking care of little things and big ones, knowing when the baby has eaten, knowing her habits, putting away her clothes, being there when she smiles for the first time."
Lysbakken is not especially original in this. A few weeks after he left on paternity leave, the justice minister, Knut Storberget, also took three months' paternity leave to take care of his baby, Ingrid. "A few years ago this would have been fairly controversial," said Lysbakken with a smile. "But today it's quite the opposite. Now not taking paternity leave would be controversial. In 20 years people's mentality has really changed.
"Norwegians think it normal for fathers to spend time with their children. If we want women to have equality in the workplace, we have to share the responsibilities in the home better."
In Norway this family revolution has a name: pappapermisjon. After every birth, the parents both benefit from a two-week leave and then divide up the 46-week parental leave paid at 100%, or alternatively, 56 weeks paid at 80%. In this way Norwegian babies spend their first year with both their parents. To encourage men to take care of their children, a special 10-week quota is reserved for them. If they are reluctant to take pappapermisjon, they lose the 10 weeks, since the time can't be transferred to the mother and the whole family loses out. The results have been spectacular. In Norway, 90% of fathers take at least 12 weeks' paternity leave.
....
Lysbakken is not especially original in this. A few weeks after he left on paternity leave, the justice minister, Knut Storberget, also took three months' paternity leave to take care of his baby, Ingrid. "A few years ago this would have been fairly controversial," said Lysbakken with a smile. "But today it's quite the opposite. Now not taking paternity leave would be controversial. In 20 years people's mentality has really changed.
"Norwegians think it normal for fathers to spend time with their children. If we want women to have equality in the workplace, we have to share the responsibilities in the home better."
In Norway this family revolution has a name: pappapermisjon. After every birth, the parents both benefit from a two-week leave and then divide up the 46-week parental leave paid at 100%, or alternatively, 56 weeks paid at 80%. In this way Norwegian babies spend their first year with both their parents. To encourage men to take care of their children, a special 10-week quota is reserved for them. If they are reluctant to take pappapermisjon, they lose the 10 weeks, since the time can't be transferred to the mother and the whole family loses out. The results have been spectacular. In Norway, 90% of fathers take at least 12 weeks' paternity leave.
....
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
77 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
even when boys' work is just as good, the higher grade is more likely to go to a girl
Romeo.lima333
Mar 2015
#1
Because discrimination is in no way related to the circumstances of most womens' lives...
antigone382
Mar 2015
#18
Difference being one is formally financially compensated and the other is not.
antigone382
Mar 2015
#20
Or alternatively, we could address gender disparities so everyone has a chance to earn an income...
antigone382
Mar 2015
#25
I'm glad for your individual, anecdotal experience, comprising a single data point in a sea of stats
antigone382
Mar 2015
#28
I think the specific cases and studies I referenced to paint a picture of discrimination.
antigone382
Mar 2015
#55
This is a serious problem. But it's not politically correct to talk about it.
davidn3600
Mar 2015
#9
men are not going to college less. their numbers are not escalating like womens.
seabeyond
Mar 2015
#11
it's interesting because when men act selfishly they often cite women as the reason- they need more
bettyellen
Mar 2015
#62
if we are talking biological, i would say more survival. with a greater income of more,
seabeyond
Mar 2015
#63
well, ya. and that is exactly the point. we do not have to eat so fast. we can slow down.
seabeyond
Mar 2015
#67
There is a lack of women in STEM. You don't think that's a problem that should be addressed?
DanTex
Mar 2015
#12
If they're being denied access, then yes. If they're choosing other majors, then no. n/t
lumberjack_jeff
Mar 2015
#31
you do not know how hard i had to fight for my two boys RIGHT to be smart while in middle school
seabeyond
Mar 2015
#38
exactly women. i finally went in and read the damn thing, and ya. and the men are saying in this
seabeyond
Mar 2015
#64
I got something completely different from the actual OECD link where they discuss the survey
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#68