General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So it turns out that nadinbrzezinski was correct re Fukushima [View all]rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)"When more and more people caught on to her act and would respond to challenge her problematic statements and assumptions, she, and some of her defenders characterized it as "bullying"." If she was doing something that violated the TOS or CS then alerts were in order. However, she posted information that apparently you and a group of others (always the same posters) saw as exaggerated and necessary to "challenge her problematic statements and assumptions" (can't type that with a straight face). Now I can see justification to "challenge problematic statements and assumptions", but when a group of 6 to 8 individuals continue to "challenge" repeatedly from post to post and thread to thread, it becomes bullying. I think you know what bullying is but you think there are times when it's appropriate and maybe even needed (to punish certain behavior). I've asked this before but yet to get an answer. What do you see as the desired outcome from ridicule and mocking? Or continued "challenge her problematic statements and assumptions". What is the intent? Trying to teach someone to change their behavior? Maybe run them off as if they were a scourge?