Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Study: Monsato's Roundup herbicide probably causes cancer [View all]yellowcanine
(36,825 posts)50. Yep - you are correct. Only "Merican" studies here......
Excerpts from Regulatory Authorities: No Evidence of Carcinogenicity
German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR)
In epidemiological studies in humans, there was no evidence of carcinogenicity and there were no effects on fertility, reproduction and development of neurotoxicity that might be attributed to glyphosate. Glyphosate Renewal Assessment Report, Germany as Rapporteur Member State for the European Renewal of Approval for Glyphosate (2015)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
EPA has concluded that glyphosate does not pose a cancer risk to humans. 2013 Federal Register Notice (FR 25396, Vol. 78, No. 84, May 1, 2013).
Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority
The APVMA currently has no data before it suggesting that glyphosate products registered in Australia and used according to label instructions present any unacceptable risks to human health, the environment and trade. The weight and strength of evidence shows that glyphosate is not genotoxic, carcinogenic or neurotoxic. Australian Government, Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (2013)
Argentine Interdisciplinary Scientific Council
The epidemiological studies reviewed, showed no correlation between exposure to glyphosate and cancer incidence, nor adverse effects on reproduction, or Hyperactive-Attention Deficit Disorder in children. It is estimated that no significant risks would exist for human health regarding adverse effects on the genetic material. Under responsible use conditions for this herbicide, the intake of food and water would not imply risks for human health. Evaluación De La Informacion Cientifica Vinculada Al Glifosato En Su Incidencia Sobre La Alud Humana Y El Ambiente, (Assessment of scientific information related to glyphosate and its incidence on human health and the environment) (2009)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Several chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity studies resulted in no effects based on the parameters examined, or resulted in findings that glyphosate was not carcinogenic in the study and Glyphosate does not cause mutations. U.S. EPA. (1993) EPA: Glyphosate. EPA-738-F-93-011. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Canadian Pest Management Regulatory Agency
Health and Welfare Canada has reviewed the glyphosate toxicology database, which is considered to be complete. The acute toxicity of glyphosate is very low. The submitted studies contain no evidence that glyphosate causes mutations, birth defects or cancer. Doliner LH. (1991) Pre-Harvest use of glyphosate herbicide . Discussion Document D91-01. 98 pp. Pesticide Information Division, Plant Industry Directorate, Agriculture Canada.
-
The epidemiological studies reviewed, showed no correlation between exposure to glyphosate and cancer incidence, nor adverse effects on reproduction, or Hyperactive-Attention Deficit Disorder in children. It is estimated that no significant risks would exist for human health regarding adverse effects on the genetic material. Under responsible use conditions for this herbicide, the intake of food and water would not imply risks for human health. Evaluación De La Informacion Cientifica Vinculada Al Glifosato En Su Incidencia Sobre La Alud Humana Y El Ambiente, (Assessment of scientific information related to glyphosate and its incidence on human health and the environment) (2009)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
59 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yes, don't give them any ideas though. Monsanto is probably working on dismissing these findings
sabrina 1
Mar 2015
#8
Excerpts from Regulatory Authorities: No Evidence of Carcinogenicity (Glyphosate aka Roundup)
yellowcanine
Mar 2015
#11
How does that relate to question at hand - whether glyphosate is a carcinogen?
yellowcanine
Mar 2015
#16
"i find it strange when someone does not err on the safe side of these issues"
yellowcanine
Mar 2015
#48
"recent studies seem to show....." Need a link if you make a claim like that.
yellowcanine
Mar 2015
#13
"skeptical about the safety of ingesting Roundup." Who is suggesting you should ingest Roundup?"
yellowcanine
Mar 2015
#49
This OP has been repeated over and over again, always with scary headlines, but no actual context.
HuckleB
Mar 2015
#21
3/20/15 W.H.O. IARC Monographs Volume 112: evaluation of five organophosphate insecticides
Zorra
Mar 2015
#25
Write them a stern letter and explain to them why their findings are all wrong. nt
Zorra
Mar 2015
#36
Nice try! But more fail. It does not even indicate that the IARC used the Seralini Study
Zorra
Mar 2015
#39
You are using a strawman to deflect from the fact that the Seralini Study was not
Zorra
Mar 2015
#42
Whatever, blahblahblah...Do you know what the funding sources for American Academics
Zorra
Mar 2015
#45
The point is you either deliberately lied when you said that the IARC relied on the Seralini
Zorra
Mar 2015
#43
I purposely didn't read the posts yet. Has the "why do you hate science?1!!?" guy posted?
U4ikLefty
Mar 2015
#47