Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Kucinich: We are Not Exiting Afghanistan. We are Staying. [View all]Zorra
(27,670 posts)70. Stuff like the opinions at this link is interesting.
http://www.myleftwing.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=17649
The perversion of the whole "big tent" meme is a device used by 1% sponsored RWers to make it acceptable for them to infiltrate and corrupt the Dem party with their RW ideology, and thereby render the Dem party largely ineffective as an opposition to the 1% and the GOP.
The purity test is not expressing, and or acting in accordance with, RW ideas and RW ideology, particularly those of the republican party. An example of those failing the purity test would be those who have adopted the ideas of Ronald Reagan. When you become your enemy, game over, they won.
The purity test was devised by everyone that ever wanted the Democratic Party to act as a unified body for the purpose of bringing into being, and then preserving, a nation based on justice, equality, compassion, and freedom.
Yeah, that's my purity test. Deal with it. I have absolutely no use whatsoever for any RW ideologies or those that corrupt the Democratic Party with them, and I make no apologies.
As for Ms. Huffington and Cenk, I don't have enough information about them to have an adequately informed opinion. But from what I have gleaned from listening to him on the radio, it appears to me that Cenk is for real.
I'm not buying Moulitsas.
What you refer to as the "Kucinich" wing of the Party is the very same thing as the traditional FDR wing of the Democratic Party.
The traditional wing of the Democratic Party supports the interests of the 99% over those of the 1%. This wing of the Party believes that people are more important than the profit making abilities and other interests of the 1%.
The Third Way supports the interests of the 1% over those of the 99%. This party, (some may call it a wing of the Democratic Party), like the GOP, believes that the profit making abilities and other interests of the 1% take precedence over the interests and needs of human beings.
By placing profit over people, all pretensions of being socially Democratic are rendered moot. Profit will always take precedence over the needs of the 99%, despite the duplicitous pleas and reassurances of the impostor Third Way that serves the 1%, and the majority of people will continue to suffer and become more powerless as the power of the 1% continues to grow.
Fuck all republicans, I mean it, fuck every one of them, including the ones pretending to be Democrats. And fuck their greed driven anti-human ideas, ideology, and actions as well.
Have a nice day.

The perversion of the whole "big tent" meme is a device used by 1% sponsored RWers to make it acceptable for them to infiltrate and corrupt the Dem party with their RW ideology, and thereby render the Dem party largely ineffective as an opposition to the 1% and the GOP.
The purity test is not expressing, and or acting in accordance with, RW ideas and RW ideology, particularly those of the republican party. An example of those failing the purity test would be those who have adopted the ideas of Ronald Reagan. When you become your enemy, game over, they won.
The term Third Way refers to various political positions which try to reconcile right-wing and left-wing politics by advocating a varying synthesis of right-wing economic and left-wing social policies.[1] Third Way was created as a serious re-evaluation of political policies within various centre-left progressive movements in response to the ramifications of the collapse of international belief in the economic viability of the state economic interventionist policies that had previously been popularized by Keynesianism; and the corresponding rise of popularity for neoliberalism and the New Right.[2] It supports the pursuit of greater egalitarianism in society through action to increase the distribution of skills, capacities, and productive endowments, while rejecting income redistribution as the means to achieve this.[3] It emphasizes commitment to: balanced budgets, providing equal opportunity combined with an emphasis on personal responsibility, decentralization of government power to the lowest level possible, encouragement of public-private partnerships, improving labour supply, investment in human development, protection of social capital, and protection of the environment.[4]
The term was later used by politicians in the 1990s who wished to incorporate Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan's projects of economic deregulation, privatization, and globalization into the mainstream centre-left political parties.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Way_%28centrism%29
The term was later used by politicians in the 1990s who wished to incorporate Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan's projects of economic deregulation, privatization, and globalization into the mainstream centre-left political parties.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Way_%28centrism%29
The purity test was devised by everyone that ever wanted the Democratic Party to act as a unified body for the purpose of bringing into being, and then preserving, a nation based on justice, equality, compassion, and freedom.
Yeah, that's my purity test. Deal with it. I have absolutely no use whatsoever for any RW ideologies or those that corrupt the Democratic Party with them, and I make no apologies.
As for Ms. Huffington and Cenk, I don't have enough information about them to have an adequately informed opinion. But from what I have gleaned from listening to him on the radio, it appears to me that Cenk is for real.
I'm not buying Moulitsas.
What you refer to as the "Kucinich" wing of the Party is the very same thing as the traditional FDR wing of the Democratic Party.
The traditional wing of the Democratic Party supports the interests of the 99% over those of the 1%. This wing of the Party believes that people are more important than the profit making abilities and other interests of the 1%.
The Third Way supports the interests of the 1% over those of the 99%. This party, (some may call it a wing of the Democratic Party), like the GOP, believes that the profit making abilities and other interests of the 1% take precedence over the interests and needs of human beings.
By placing profit over people, all pretensions of being socially Democratic are rendered moot. Profit will always take precedence over the needs of the 99%, despite the duplicitous pleas and reassurances of the impostor Third Way that serves the 1%, and the majority of people will continue to suffer and become more powerless as the power of the 1% continues to grow.
Fuck all republicans, I mean it, fuck every one of them, including the ones pretending to be Democrats. And fuck their greed driven anti-human ideas, ideology, and actions as well.
Have a nice day.

Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
83 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If you actually read the agreement, you would see you are wrong. You have overstated
morningfog
May 2012
#83
Is it true or not? Your comment had no content. If it is then the truth will be told, regardless of
sabrina 1
May 2012
#23
It is true that this OP is more negative priming from Better Believe It, yes.
Bolo Boffin
May 2012
#26
Dennis Kucinich is not someone who lies. I asked if what he said is true or not. I am not interested
sabrina 1
May 2012
#44
i prefer posts which are truth and linked to people i respect, like kucinich, instead of blind faith
xiamiam
May 2012
#56
Yeah. Too bad only you and a handful of people thought so. DK has been shown the door.
Tarheel_Dem
May 2012
#9
Did most Democrats in the House vote for or against progressive legislation he proposed?
Better Believe It
May 2012
#18
So you can't refute the points in my post. I didn't think you would/could.
Better Believe It
May 2012
#32
how many days a week do i see "he can't do it alone!" as a reason obama hasn't achieved what
HiPointDem
May 2012
#33
"Prior to enlisting in the Army, Moulitsas was a member of the Republican Party."
Zorra
May 2012
#60
Would Cenk & Arianna also be considered "rare exceptions"? What's your criteria?
Tarheel_Dem
May 2012
#63
Yes, I have done so many times. Have you checked the average 'accomplishments' of members
sabrina 1
May 2012
#58
Telling the truth is a career killer in Washington DC. He was right the last time we were being
sabrina 1
May 2012
#24
True, the war drums continue to beat, they will never end until the American people get tough
sabrina 1
May 2012
#25
The government is actually leaving thousands of troops behind for "counter-insurgency" and stuff
Better Believe It
May 2012
#31
This: "Obama's midnight dash to Kabul shows that he dare not visit the place in daylight"
FSogol
May 2012
#22
Except it's true. Do you really think any US president can safely appear in any of the countries
sabrina 1
May 2012
#28
I would suggest using planes to responsibly remove the troops from Afghanistan.
Better Believe It
May 2012
#39
It is totally accurate. " All U.S. troops were removed by March, 1973." They were not.
Better Believe It
May 2012
#71
Well I guess if you count embassy troops then we have troops in about 150 countries.
former9thward
May 2012
#74
You're right. All U.S. troops haven't left Iraq and the U.S. has troops stationed in 150 nations.
Better Believe It
May 2012
#75