General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]BainsBane
(57,769 posts)but solidarity must be a goal. It has become clear to me that for many the goal is the opposite.
I don't know what people do in their offline lives, but I do know how they respond to suggestions about organizing. I also can discern political trends and phenomena in the nation. If the state of political mobilization were anything approaching what is was in the 1930s, there would be no concealing it. Additionally, I have found those who complain the loudest about the Democratic party are also the most resistant to any proposals for change other than substituting one member of the political elite for another.
Holding up FDR as a model doesn't provide focus. It is escapist and ahistorical. Presenting a conservative view of history in which great men act from on high promotes the conservative worldview (not as in GOP but in the traditional meaning of the word) it comes from. It does nothing to promote activism or change, and it ignores the blood and sweat of the millions of Americans who actually made the New Deal. If one refuses to understand how social change comes about, that leaves no possibility for bringing it about in the future.