Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
Wed Mar 25, 2015, 03:31 PM Mar 2015

How California Could Boost Voter Turnout By Millions - ThinkProgress [View all]

How California Could Boost Voter Turnout By Millions
by Alice Ollstein - ThinkProgress
Posted on March 25, 2015 at 12:42 pm Updated: March 25, 2015 at 2:23


CREDIT: Shutterstock

<snip>

Just a week after Oregon became the first state in the nation to automatically register residents to vote using DMV records, California announced it may follow suit.

California Secretary of State Alex Padilla said this week that he was inspired by Oregon’s landmark law, which automatically registers every eligible resident who goes to a DMV to get a license or renew one, with the option to opt out.

“While many states are making it more difficult for citizens to vote, our neighbor to the north offers a better path,” he wrote. “One of the biggest barriers to citizen participation is the voter registration process. A new, enhanced Motor Voter law would strengthen our democracy. It would be a game changer.”


One early supporter is California Congresswoman Julia Brownley (D-Westlake Village), who told ThinkProgress, “Any measure that would make it easier for American citizens to exercise their constitutional right to vote is a good thing for our democracy. We need to ensure that the viewpoints and values of all Americans are represented in government.”

While Oregon’s law is expected to reach 300,000 eligible residents right away, and nearly 900,000 eventually, such a move in California could sweep millions into the political process. Padilla’s proposal could help the nearly 7 million eligible but unregistered voters in the state, many of them low-income, people of color, and younger Californians — whose participation rates are in the single digits.

“In California, an 18- or 19-year-old was more likely to be arrested than actually vote in one of the statewide elections,” California data analyst David Mitchell told KQED.


Overall, California has one of the worst rates of election participation in the country, with just over 42 percent of eligible voters turning out in last fall’s election. In Los Angeles County, just 31 percent of registered voters cast a ballot.

Those who do vote tend to be...

<snip>

More: http://thinkprogress.org/election/2015/03/25/3638636/california-boost-voter-turnout-millions/



33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This should be done across the country. How is it that being selected for jury duty is mandatory but BlueCaliDem Mar 2015 #1
Because it's not right to force people to exercise a right n/t SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2015 #3
Then change the wording. Make it a civil DUTY. You know? Just like being forced to sit on a jury. nt BlueCaliDem Mar 2015 #7
Change the wording of the Constitution? SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2015 #9
Where in the Constitution does it mandate jury duty? That's right. It doesn't. Yet the moment you BlueCaliDem Mar 2015 #10
Addendum... BlueCaliDem Mar 2015 #11
Voting is a Constitutional right SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2015 #13
Can you point out to me where in the Constitution it states that voting is a Constitutional Right? BlueCaliDem Mar 2015 #14
I don't think you want to go down the road of only acknowledging enumerated rights SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2015 #15
This may surprise you, but there is no right to vote enshrined in the U.S. Constitution. BlueCaliDem Mar 2015 #16
OK, playing your game, are you saying that unless a right is written in the Constitution SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2015 #17
The U.S. Supreme Court is a "wannabe internet Constitional lawyer"? Um, no. BlueCaliDem Mar 2015 #18
Sorry, I think you're wrong SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2015 #21
Nope. But you are. BlueCaliDem Mar 2015 #22
And again, you avoid the question SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2015 #24
I've presented the facts. You haven't. And I didn't know it was a requirement that we answer BlueCaliDem Mar 2015 #25
You're right, you don't have to answer any questions SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2015 #28
I've never said such a thing. That's what YOU make of it, and that's why I've ignored your BlueCaliDem Mar 2015 #31
automatically registering people to vote is an awesome idea and not unconstitutional CreekDog Mar 2015 #19
According to SOTOP, it's totally unconstitional. He knows he's wrong. He's BlueCaliDem Mar 2015 #26
It's not unconstitutional to force someone to register SickOfTheOnePct Mar 2015 #29
Yeah. I know. You didn't appear to know, judging from your response to my BlueCaliDem Mar 2015 #32
2014 midterms, CA turnout 42%. Oregon turnout 69.3% and we thought that was low.... Bluenorthwest Mar 2015 #2
Oregon Old Codger Mar 2015 #4
That high? It was less than 30% in my county Retrograde Mar 2015 #8
You still have to get them to the polls angryvet Mar 2015 #5
Knock Down One Obstacle At A Time... WillyT Mar 2015 #6
California *does* have permanent vote by mail in every county, but not exclusively so. It's still BlueCaliDem Mar 2015 #12
California does have vote by mail CreekDog Mar 2015 #20
Me, too. eom BlueCaliDem Mar 2015 #27
Vote by mail is available to all California voters Retrograde Mar 2015 #23
I don't see this as being a big help ripcord Mar 2015 #30
Ifd they were truly serious about adding more voters they would Bandit Mar 2015 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How California Could Boos...