General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Women only: Regarding the use of the term 'girls' to describe women. [View all]DutchLiberal
(5,744 posts)The real disgrace is that I got a post hidden because somebody alerted and took the subject-line of that one post deliberately out of context. And of course the jurors didn't bother to read the whole thread to read my previous, much more elaborate comments which gave a totally different picture of my thoughts than the one line the alerter abused to get me kicked out of the thread and brand me as someone I'm not.
My best friend in high school was a rape survivor. So is my cousin. Yet I have to sit here and be told I'm "condoning sexual assault" because I don't think consensual sex with an inexperienced girl is assault. Like they said it was assault when president Kennedy had sex with his secretary. So they tricked me in explaining my position, then alerted on me, had my post hidden and now I am 'branded'...
Some people on DU play these games. They go to great lenghts to blacken other good members. Character assassination is their preferred tool. Defamation and vilification are no strangers to them. And once you disagree with them in another thread, on another subject, all they have to do is point at the transparency page they helped to create by deliberately misrepresenting someone's views in the first place.
That's how they roll.
They're not interested in discussion. They're not interested in other people's points of view, unless those are in line with theirs. If they are, there will be no end to patting the other on the back, handing out compliments, spreading hugging emoticons etc. But when you're not in agreement, the only thing you'll get is "lol"-s, "rofl"-s, maybe a "Geez!" or "sigh" if you're lucky. That's not what I call a discussion.
If you don't agree with them on all issues all the time, you're a sexist and a misogynist.