Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: BREAKING: WikiLeaks Leaks TPP Draft!!! [View all]BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)107. Kick and R.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
286 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
But do they get to make their own corporate tribunals? We already have 'pay for' prisons
Rex
Mar 2015
#54
It looks like all our laws, Environmental eg, would mean nothing. Iow, a Foreign Corporation would
sabrina 1
Mar 2015
#84
Yes, and everywhere the IMF/World Bank has been, disaster for the people can be found. But success
sabrina 1
Mar 2015
#90
At least there is no wiggle room here, you either support 'free trade' or you support
Rex
Mar 2015
#204
And who gets to decide what's 'bogus' about a given environmental law?
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Mar 2015
#219
We have to attack the root problem, campaign donations, Super PACs, and the Revolving Door!
Dustlawyer
Mar 2015
#117
The TPP apologists will tell you that this isn't a signed version and that
rhett o rick
Mar 2015
#12
But it's just a draft! And Julian Assange is wanted on 8 continents! And most of the oceans!
Doctor_J
Mar 2015
#42
Though there is some debate about the validity of the warrent issued for Pluto nt
dflprincess
Mar 2015
#53
Thank you kpete for all your hard work here. This is an important story. nm
rhett o rick
Mar 2015
#11
There are a handful of posters here that are indespensible. kpete is high on the list. nm
rhett o rick
Mar 2015
#22
I've thought about that long and hard. Countries or what ever takes their place as groups of
rhett o rick
Mar 2015
#26
Yes. Without some sense of belonging to a certain group how would TPTB keep us fighting
cui bono
Mar 2015
#70
I have noticed there is always a brief interlude before they descend, most likely in order to get
Dragonfli
Mar 2015
#24
I've heard rumors that they hang out at another site to plot their attacks.
rhett o rick
Mar 2015
#27
I think it's childish, like the school yard. "let's all gang together and beat up the smart kid." nm
rhett o rick
Mar 2015
#96
and those who don't want to read anything til it's signed, sealed and delivered.
ND-Dem
Mar 2015
#25
jeez, i didn't know that part. so the folks here at DU who keep saying we have to wait
ND-Dem
Mar 2015
#71
k&r. looks like a lot of the things they've been predicting would happen. a big clusterfuck,
ND-Dem
Mar 2015
#23
I see the comment "All this hyperbole is equivalent to "Death Panels in the ACA"." as hyperbole.
WillTwain
Mar 2015
#217
You have made my point, opinions are posted when the final focument has not been released
Thinkingabout
Mar 2015
#286
Bingo! ... If Adam Smith were alive in today's USA, he would be in the Warren/Sanders wing of the...
Faryn Balyncd
Mar 2015
#51
+10. How little changes from so long ago, mind blowing. Appreciate the exerpts.
appalachiablue
Mar 2015
#78
Well in order to talk about Smith, you have to talk about the social safe net. GOPers can't do that
Rex
Mar 2015
#222
Call your Senators, Representatives and Whitehouse to express your opposition to this global
Dont call me Shirley
Mar 2015
#36
Someone did a post here about FAXING your comment to a Rep. because they will receive and possibly
appalachiablue
Mar 2015
#76
I heard on Thom Hartmann that for every one person who calls their rep/WH, they represent
Dont call me Shirley
Mar 2015
#119
On a mostly serious note, do you think that when one of the foreign/transnationals actually
Doctor_J
Mar 2015
#45
And by then, most of us will have learned the joy of genuflecting to our betters n/t
deutsey
Mar 2015
#134
I expect some kind of "3D chess" analogy or some other way to explain away all the bad...
Veilex
Mar 2015
#91
Exxon Mobil nets about 30 billion a year. a lawsuit costing 100 grand would set them
Doctor_J
Mar 2015
#234
At least we can count on Democratic presidential contenders to lead the fight
Karmadillo
Mar 2015
#57
And Obama is STILL fighting tooth and nail to get this monstrosity passed into law.
blkmusclmachine
Mar 2015
#74
http://www.thecommentator.com/system/articles/inner_pictures/000/005/415/original/obama-laughing.jpg
blkmusclmachine
Mar 2015
#75
I don't know about you, but I'm not a big fan of the idea of our corporations being able to go after
F4lconF16
Mar 2015
#192
The US isn't the multinationals that headquarter here, they are largely our enemies
TheKentuckian
Mar 2015
#126
Wrong about what? That the US isn't the multinationals that headquarter here?
TheKentuckian
Mar 2015
#181
The US is not the corporations that headquarter here. The US isn't the captured government
TheKentuckian
Mar 2015
#279
ISDS is to our advantage.....and while I think Warren is correct to question
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#142
Because maybe constantly screwing over other countries isn't in the best longterm interests of
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Mar 2015
#223
Indeed it is. And "the key issue on which we are consulting is whether the proposed approach
pampango
Mar 2015
#145
There are a couple in this thread and they pretty much are babbling their usual nonsense.
BeanMusical
Mar 2015
#97
Cheney negotiated U.S. energy policy in secrecy in 2000, did not trust that either.
WillTwain
Mar 2015
#260
Perhaps someone could boil down all this text to one or two points why people should be worried.
randome
Mar 2015
#120
This is all about bashing the President and Democrats, it is not about a trade deal.
tridim
Mar 2015
#131
You say you want enlightenment? Start reading this and then form your own opinion on it.
Autumn
Mar 2015
#156
A transition to a corporate world government that will hasten the flow of profit to the top 1%
PatrickforO
Mar 2015
#150
Any safety regulations--on lead in kids' toys, for example--can now be destroyed by lawsuit
Wella
Mar 2015
#179
Which destroys sovereignty by making this private (world) tribunal the real arbiters of laws
Wella
Mar 2015
#183
Which means that the sovereignty of this country no longer exists. You may be fine with that
sabrina 1
Mar 2015
#207
Fortunately what you don't have a problem with, isn't relevant. As I said, the 'war' can be
sabrina 1
Mar 2015
#216
You do realize there is currently nothing to prevent corporations from doing business anywhere.
randome
Mar 2015
#248
I know I'm supposed to be unquestionably enraged but I cannot bring myself to do it.
great white snark
Mar 2015
#249