Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Physicians' Joint Report: At Least 1.3 Million Lives Lost to US-Led War on Terror [View all]Renew Deal
(82,756 posts)22. Those that thought it was OK to vote for Nader because "there is no difference" should think about
that.
Same with those saying things like that today. The fact is that if Gore was president, many of these things wouldn't have happened.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Physicians' Joint Report: At Least 1.3 Million Lives Lost to US-Led War on Terror [View all]
RiverLover
Mar 2015
OP
Those that thought it was OK to vote for Nader because "there is no difference" should think about
Renew Deal
Mar 2015
#22
Exactly. Reducing it to a preschooler's view of the world is the only way to justify these horrors.
nomorenomore08
Mar 2015
#12
We have been deceived, manipulated and made apathetic about voting. Reagan started it with
Dont call me Shirley
Mar 2015
#18
If their "Practical Politics" calls for condoning the killing of 1.3 million people,
Maedhros
Mar 2015
#27
And this is why I can not and will not support those that will not speak out against the MIC
F4lconF16
Mar 2015
#26
I will not trade 1.3 million lives simply so we can claim victory in the tribal squabble
Maedhros
Mar 2015
#29