Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: ANOTHER goddamned "DEMOCRAT" pushing for unnecessary Soc Security cuts - FASTTRACKING THEM. [View all]cstanleytech
(28,473 posts)41. Means testing doesnt really make much sense unless its for the already wealthy otherwise its shitty
and its especially shitty for the disabled who are on social security and I dont believe they deserve to have even more misery piled on them by these assholes.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
204 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
ANOTHER goddamned "DEMOCRAT" pushing for unnecessary Soc Security cuts - FASTTRACKING THEM. [View all]
Triana
Mar 2015
OP
They are going to be more emboldened by the money from their oligarchy bankster owners.
L0oniX
Mar 2015
#21
Fast-tracking has its place but not here. This is pure politics instead of pure policy.
randome
Mar 2015
#2
You might want to tell the Third Way that - they get little hit pieces on Liz Warren published in
djean111
Mar 2015
#82
And they even issued a press release about Delaney's cat food commission. They're delighted!
octoberlib
Mar 2015
#87
Yes, she is a Democrat - and the banks are pissed off and threatening because she is acting like
djean111
Mar 2015
#162
Wall Street banks threaten to withhold campaign funds from Dems in tantrum against Elizabeth Warren
L0oniX
Mar 2015
#27
That would be great. Get the money out of politics. In fact I think any Dem who publicy
sabrina 1
Mar 2015
#53
Wife and I and our kids were discussing what we can do , when, as to social security
NoJusticeNoPeace
Mar 2015
#5
I get that, but the few democrats who want this cant get this if dems control everything, dont you
NoJusticeNoPeace
Mar 2015
#36
From the party that keeps demanding my money so that these things WON'T happen
FiveGoodMen
Mar 2015
#6
Wall Street banks threaten to withhold campaign funds from Dems in tantrum against Elizabeth Warren
L0oniX
Mar 2015
#29
This needs to be an OP every week, because every week we will see someone else blink.
arcane1
Apr 2015
#203
a minor piece of legislation that extended the time frame for bringing an action under
ND-Dem
Mar 2015
#189
No, Congress sold its moral compass. Actually, Washington sold its moral compass, IMO.
djean111
Mar 2015
#17
Scott Peters, worth over 100 million, my disgusting "New Dem" Rep, cosponsoring, natch
stuffmatters
Mar 2015
#88
lets face it, BOTH parties are screwing us equally just for different reasons. NT
fxstc
Mar 2015
#32
There are only two changes that need to be made: first raise the cap and second raise the
jwirr
Mar 2015
#33
Is he one of those Democrats we're suppose to be "loyal" to? However disloyal he may be?
Tierra_y_Libertad
Mar 2015
#37
Means testing doesnt really make much sense unless its for the already wealthy otherwise its shitty
cstanleytech
Mar 2015
#41
Delaney is the 6th Wealthiest member of Congress, both chambers, and the only former CEO of a
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2015
#44
Been here for less than 2 days and not very subtle. That stay will be short.
BeanMusical
Mar 2015
#137
Please proceed to kick some Weakassconservative ass whenever it appears on DU.
stillwaiting
Mar 2015
#161
EVERY time these bastards discuss this their answer is "Raise the Retirement Age"....
groundloop
Mar 2015
#55
That is the worst part, it is already 67. They are really shooting for 70+
TheKentuckian
Mar 2015
#89
And yet we're expected to pull the lever for anyone with a "D" after their name...
MindPilot
Mar 2015
#57
Give me an example of a Republican's being better. I'll wait. And if you're only to going to say
WinkyDink
Mar 2015
#61
So is GOTV gonna work with asses like this in the party? Or oh noes supreme court!!!!??
Autumn
Mar 2015
#64
The only "fast tracking" we should support is getting bums like these OUT OF OFFICE!
cascadiance
Mar 2015
#70
Me think you better ask Hillary what she thinks about each of these changes to soc.sec....
TheNutcracker
Mar 2015
#133
" Fast Tracking" has become the new ALEC strategy... first TPP now this cutting soc security
stuffmatters
Mar 2015
#91
These people are suppose to represent us and they are cutting us out of the process.
liberal_at_heart
Mar 2015
#92
Maybe once some of these so called Democrats start attacking gay rights and abortion rights,
liberal_at_heart
Mar 2015
#102
The 1% is ok with those things. They have gay partners they want to share their wealth with.
ND-Dem
Mar 2015
#149
Social Security can be made solvent by taxing the wealthy the same as the middle class.
YOHABLO
Mar 2015
#115
It is solvent and would have been infinitely more solvent if politicians had not misusded OASDI fund
merrily
Mar 2015
#128
it does make sense. if the same percent of billionaires' incomes and peons' incomes is
ND-Dem
Mar 2015
#152
Disagree totally. Billionaires like Peterson are acting as though they own it anyway
merrily
Mar 2015
#154
But they don't own it. Which is why we haven't yet lost it. and since the "underfunding"
ND-Dem
Mar 2015
#155
The public doesn't get to vote on it. If the PTB decide to change it, they can. All that holds
ND-Dem
Mar 2015
#157
I proferred no plan and stated no myth that OASDI is going under. To the contrary, I said it is
merrily
Mar 2015
#158
Yes, my Reply 158 accurately described Reply 128, to which your reply 175 links.
merrily
Apr 2015
#196
social security is ALREADY solvent. by going along with their narrative you already cede the
ND-Dem
Mar 2015
#142
No No No .. CPI. NO two more years of waiting. If anything, we should lower the age of eligibility
YOHABLO
Mar 2015
#132
First of all, workers pay into SS. It is their money. The government is trying to steal their money.
liberal_at_heart
Mar 2015
#135
I'm doing a Twitter war with him right now--he sez he's in facor of raising the cap
eridani
Mar 2015
#195
Fuck 'em. Fuck 'em all. Fuck the whole gawdamned lot of them. If there is a hell, I hope they fry
Tuesday Afternoon
Mar 2015
#169
The label of democrat does not mean one is a democrat. Many democratic politicians
RKP5637
Apr 2015
#201