General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Woman accused of cutting unborn baby from mother will not face murder charges [View all]NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I do get your point there. I think the grade of that slope diminishes as long as the proper victim is recognized in the legislation. The anti-choicers want to recognize the fetus as a victim. I think the victim here is clear. If the victim is the mother, I think it somewhat negates the slippery slope. Just some thoughts Trumad. I think there is a way it can be done. I think new laws do need to be enacted in this area. Laws that recognize the true victim. There are laws that will be used against the assailant. They are laws to address most of the crime but not the heinous intent of the crime. Right now, the heinousness of the crime will not be taken directly into account on its own. It will be taken into account at sentencing if found guilty under current laws.
Murder would not be applicable in my opinion because there was no victim or murder. There is a victim here and their grievances go way past attempted murder, assault, or any such current law.
The rights of women can't be minimized due to our fear of the trend of rolling back our current rights. We have the right to carry to term. No laws currently on the books rise to the occasion in this instance. This woman losing her fetus will not be directly recognized under current law. She will always be the victim of a crime where the assailant was not charged with the most egregious part of the act. That part also being the whole intent behind the heinous act.